23
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
23 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
54370 readers
177 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
Depends on how good the AI was, surely? An LLM would be shocking, but something actually designed for policy work might be worthwhile.
We don't have enough structured data in this domain to be able to use anything other than LLMs. At least, not in the timeframe of OP's hypothetical.
It’s likely to be an LLM, because current benchmarks show that LLMs have made significant improvements, they can even solve some of Erdős’s problems or help solve them to some extent. By 2028, LLMs could do more or better understand the problems.
However, it will also depend on what kind of policies that LLM influenced, because if they were negative policies, there will be public backlash. On the other hand, if they were positive policies, there will be debates about whether politicians should use LLMs to choose the best course of action, or whether some will suggest replacing human politicians with LLM politicians.