54
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
54 points (100.0% liked)
Open Source
46903 readers
281 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
I think that below is probably a fair summary, but I note that I'm a FOSS user and contributor and this is my opinion.
As a software developer, I think that this case is important because there is a growing trend by companies and individuals to hide source code from the community, even if that software was originally licensed to them under an irrevocable licence. In this case, as I understand it, the Bambu Labs software is a fork of Prussia Slicer, which itself is a fork of Slic3r, all of which is licensed under the AGPL.
Wasn't his last video about that? There's no new information?
I didn't see any other video in relation to this.
As I understand it, the author of the AGPL has recently posted about software that's including closed source modules and the person who was told to cease and desist has documented exactly what the issue is based entirely on Bambu Labs' source code. There's also discussion about reverse engineering.
I don't know if any of that is new ground or not, as I said, this is the first video I watched on the topic, it randomly turned up in my feed.
The first 4 words in this video are "in my previous video..."
s/see/watch/