423
Extortion Using Smart Glasses Is a Thing Now
(gizmodo.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
423 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
84797 readers
3828 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Why should she be ok with a random stranger recording her? Whether doing something illegal or not. Why can't people just not fuck with people? Why does she have to defend her peace?
I think they must be pushing back on the term “extortion” in the title, when it’s really “harassment“. I don’t think they implied that it’s fine, just that the title was not representative of the actual story.
Yes, the original bbc article this one is referring to is much less clickbaity:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy87wqz0q9o
This is a much better article.
It's extortion because he was refusing to take the video down unless she paid.
Did you miss the multiple points in my message where I said I'm not defending it? I don't understand why the guy is recording. I don't get why these random people care. From the second you leave your house, 90% of your day is recorded. Between doorbell cameras, and red light cameras, and store cameras, and dash cams on other cars. You're being recorded pretty much everywhere except for the bathroom.
I don't understand the outrage because I don't get the hook.
Like if you said this guy was following just one woman, repeatedly, then I would understand. That's stalking.
If he were doing it at the beach, I would understand, because clearly there's a sexual element to what he's doing.
But I don't understand the hook, because I don't get why he's doing it. What's the appeal of watching random women at the grocery store? What's the point in posting them online? What is the cause of the outrage? You're being recorded from his glasses, yes, but you're also being recorded from like 8 other camera angles with or without him. And I don't understand posting them online. Who would watch these videos?
NONE of it makes sense to me. You seem to think I'm attacking this woman, when in fact what I'm asking is "What the hell is any of this?" Either the article left out some key piece of context that explains everything, or I just don't get it. But I'm not attacking her.
For "content".
Because creeps can stalk and harass you online.
There's a video on YouTube of a guy counting to 100,000. That's it. Simply counting out loud in a droning voice. It has over 33 million views. What's the appeal of that?
Sure, but the store isn't posting those videos on social media for people to comment on. If they were, they'd probably get sued, and for good reason.
I mean, the rest of your comment aside, this isn’t the case. You are in public. In fact, you’re “in public” in a private establishment, with which you have an assumed agreement to be recorded and for that recording to be used in any way the company sees fit.
There are thousands of recordings of people from security cameras on YouTube. From Walmart to tiny gas stations, all being used to farm interactions. One channel I’ve seen puts up explicitly videos of people stealing from them.
None of that can be sued over. Or more accurately, it wouldn’t be a successful suit. Because there is no expectation of privacy in public.