161
Whoopsie
(lemmy.ml)
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/45833034
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
161 points (100.0% liked)
Seize The Memes of Production
140 readers
115 users here now
The goal of this sub is to arm the proletariat with memes, reactions etc. that can be shared to create class consciousness, and push socialist politics, one meme at the time.
AI might be deleted on sight, but is allowed in many cases. Such as changing and improving memes. Or if it just is really good. Quality is what matters.
Rules
- No encouragement of violence (I just don't want responsibility, sorry) 1.1 Will just be deleted, no explanation
- Be nice, no assholes
- No discrimination/bullying (except bourgeoise, powerful)
- Making fun of being a bootlicker is allowed, but not bullying of a specific proletariat person.
- No anti-LGBT+++
- No pro-capitalism
founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
Lend-Lease was important without a doubt, but it’s often overstated by westerners. The USSR had already survived Moscow, won at Stalingrad, and held at Kursk before Lend-Lease was arriving at scale. It was also not what mainly armed the Red Army; the core weapons were overwhelmingly Soviet-made. Its biggest value was logistics: trucks, food, aluminum, machine tools, communications gear, etc. It made Soviet offensives faster and better supplied. But was far from decisive.
A fair estimate is that Lend-Lease probably shortened the war by something like 12–18 months, which is significant and meant many lives saved. But that is different from saying it was any sort of decisive reason for victory over the Nazis. The decisive factors were without a doubt Soviet industry, Soviet manpower, Soviet battlefield performance, and the Eastern Front destroying the main body of the Wehrmacht.
This is 100% right. The turning point of the eastern front was Stalingrad, 1942, and most of lend-lease aid came after.
After Stalingrad it was clear that the Soviets would not be pushed back, and the nazis were on their heels for the rest of the war (even though it continued to be a slog). That's also why the US decided to open the western front in 1944: to prevent an inevitable Red Europe.
The soviets might have killed just as many germans without lend-lease, we'll never know, but with over 75 percent of their trucks, and something like half the fuel being delivered through lend lease, there's no way they would have made it into Germany. The US also delivered a great deal of food aid with that.
You can believe what you want but I hope you understand that historians do not generally support your idea of what happened. Even American historians of the Eastern Front like David Glantz, argue that without Lend-Lease the USSR still defeats Germany, but later and at greater cost. So again yes, Lend-Lease trucks, food, fuel, rail equipment, aluminum, machine tools, and communications gear were incredibly valuable. They improved Soviet logistics, saved lives, and likely shortened the war by up to a year or more. But that is not the same as saying Lend-Lease was the decisive factor in victory (because it wasn't).
By the time Lend-Lease really kicked into gear at major scale, the Nazis had already failed at Moscow, been crushed at Stalingrad, and lost the strategic initiative after Kursk. The USSR had also already relocated much of its industry beyond the Urals, outside German reach, and was producing the bulk of its own tanks, artillery, aircraft, ammunition, and small arms. Lend-Lease helped the Red Army advance faster and more efficiently, from 1943 onward, but the claim that the USSR could not have reached Germany without it is just nonsense.