57
submitted 4 weeks ago by Valuy@lemmy.zip to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] grainfed@quokk.au 5 points 4 weeks ago

Why "may"? If they have insufficient data to assert a statement, then is it just as useful to state that it "may not"? So, fruit and veggie consumption may not influence early onset lung cancer.

[-] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago

Because they have enough data to form a hypothesis that requires more research to confirm. Even if you leave the "may" out it'd be very vague because we don't know what exactly causes the cancer. Pesticides on vegetables is just their best guess and even if that's correct, which ones exactly? It might also be something else entirely that happens to correlate with a veggie heavy nutrition but has little to do with the vegetables themselves.

Uncertainty isn't a bad thing.

[-] chunes@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

let's be real, these things never get 'confirmed.'

A lot of times, studies have results that aren't specific or rigorous enough to be definitive, but they can still point the way to how a more conclusive study might be conducted. Just part of the scientific process.

this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
57 points (100.0% liked)

science

27245 readers
670 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS