288
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by WanderWisley@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

The first Jurassic Park movie is all time one of the greatest films ever made with the special effects still holding up to this day. The 2nd film was still very enjoyable in my opinion but it was just a cookie cutter sequel not bad, not good. The 3rd film wasn’t great at all. But compared to the rest of the series the 3rd film is basically the godfather.

As another personal pick the 1st blade movie is a hood classic good. The other 2 not so much.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 16 points 14 hours ago
[-] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

I like the old mad max movies more than the new ones. Haven't seen evil dead, added them to the download list.

[-] sup@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 hours ago
[-] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, the last 3 movies and TV series were amazing right? Like I didn't fall asleep after 30min of each hobbit movie and the first 2 episodes of the series or anything. I have no recollection of anything that happened in any of those movies, other than that it was massive CGI circle jerk slop.

[-] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

The lord of the rings trilogy could be a single long movie. I feel like it fits but really isn't in the spirt of the question.

I feel like it needs to be "First movie was so good, so they made a sequel"

[-] osanna@lemmy.vg 1 points 6 hours ago

Harvey Weinstein actually wanted LOTR to be a single movie.

I am of the opinion that Fellowship is the best one, but the sequels are by no means bad.

[-] fizzbang@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

I think the mainstream opinion is that the two towers is the best. I’m curious, why do you favor the fellowship?

This is a bit rambly, but bear with me. I am very much enamored with the Hobbits and the Shire. Though I prefer the theatrical release (the pacing in that version is perfect), Concerning Hobbits is a fantastic inclusion in the extended version and I love getting that extra time in the Shire. There is a feeling of quaint magic in that movie that isn't present in the other ones. I like that the film is told from the perspective of Hobbits. It makes the world outside the Shire that much more mysterious and foreboding, some of which I feel is lost when the Fellowship splits up. I think Gandalf the Grey is a vastly more interesting character than Gandalf the White. I personally find underground spaces incredibly fascinating, so everything in Moria is just incredible. That moment where they're surrounded by goblins and you hear the rumble of the Balrog, and the goblins flee and Gandalf is just, "Run." Ugh, its got a great sense of terror and is just perfect.

[-] fizzbang@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I’m here for the rambles.

I think you have an interesting perspective. The shire kind of grounds the world as a reader / viewer. It’s the place you want to get back to.

this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
288 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

54149 readers
960 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS