184
Alzheimer's: High-dose flu vaccine may cut risk by 55%
(www.medicalnewstoday.com)
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
dart board;; science bs
rule #1: be kind
What a strange fragile creature you are.
From your article
Your lived experience is not universal, and the peaceful experience happens in 1 in 5 people in hospitals, yet you tell others it's universal and they should look forward to it?
Are you shitposting for attention? In a death cult?
@in_my_honest_opinion
Oh come now, reduced to a single line of text?
No rebuttal for the scientific articles?
What happened to that spunk? We were having fun!
If you are done bothering me, that's fine. I have a coffee enema to resume now. Good day.
That single line of text you can't refute? Is that what it takes for you to find some other thread to engage with?
@in_my_honest_opinion
You know what you did when you edited that post buddy, quit playing.
This isn't twitter, I read your article and responded. You keep ascribing motives to my responses that aren't mine...didn't you say something about projection?
@in_my_honest_opinion
"Notably, two-year outcomes for cardiac arrest survivors with and without NDE demonstrated a transformative effect that impacted social attitude, religious attitude, attitude toward death, and an interest in the meaning of life and appreciation of ordinary things."
Ok Pollyanna
@in_my_honest_opinion
I accept your resignation. Have a terrific day.
Dr. Phil.....gross.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/10/21/teen-sues-dr-phil/
@in_my_honest_opinion
If you prefer:
Man, this really sums you up. Good job.
https://democraticautopsy.org/how-democrats-lost-the-white-house/
@in_my_honest_opinion
You recognize that from previous interactions do you?
@in_my_honest_opinion
Your L, my friend. Enjoy it.
Kinda one note no?
@in_my_honest_opinion
Well, we started off having a fun little debate, and you've done absolutely nothing to convince anyone of anything, and you apparently want so badly to have the last word that you will resort to personal attacks and shitposting articles about Dr. Phil.
It's clear you are enjoying these little exchanges for whatever reason, so I will keep providing you with "L's" until I get bored I guess.
I understand, GPTs often get stuck in loops. It can be helpful to reset the context window.
Write me a poem about how nitrides can precipitate out of fertilizer and when endothermic can make beautiful colors.
@in_my_honest_opinion
Roses are red
Violets are blue
The way that you act,
I'm embarrassed for you.
Ugh typical LLM doesn't adhere to the prompt once the chat goes long enough.
Let's try something simpler, visit
https://piefed.social/post/1982931#comment_10973614
And tell me what you see. Is it an invitation to a prolonged internet slapfight about you injecting pop sci slop into a discussion about a novel vaccine that could remedy Alzheimer's?
@in_my_honest_opinion
I stuck to an easy to read article so folks with your level of reading comprehension could easily follow along.
Sadly, you didn't have much of anything clever to say about the other articles.
So you're saying the whole science@lemmy.world community is only able to parse AI slop articles? When what was posted references medical journals? The initial responses reference published papers?
You want to pollute your own mastodon feed with an internet slapfight? What's your goal here? Why are you shitposting in a science comm and using a mastodon connector to do it?
Do you have a history of being banned and are using a throwaway mastodon account for attention?
@in_my_honest_opinion
Now you represent the entire online community?
Get over yourself kid.
I don't think you properly read what I quoted. "So folks with your level of reading comprehension"
That is a generalization. You included the whole science@lemmy.world community with that generalization. You for some reason who already has a pattern of directly tagging me, instead chose to say "folks".
Now you're flooding the thread with AI slop L's.
I'm not upset, I'm mostly trying to get you to spam enough so we can get you banned as spammer.
@in_my_honest_opinion
Ban me.
"Avoidance of Debate Content: Once a challenging question, point or issue is raised, you shift focus from the topic at hand to personal attacks or commentary on the individual raising a point, with no attempt to address the actual point. By derailing the discussion, you avoid answering questions or facing issues you find uncomfortable or threatening."
Spamming is the use of messaging systems to send multiple unsolicited messages (spam) to large numbers of recipients for the purpose of commercial advertising, non-commercial proselytizing, or any prohibited purpose (especially phishing). It can also be repeatedly sending the same message to the same user .
@in_my_honest_opinion
"Obsession with Their Opposition: Demonstrating an inability to focus on the actual topic of debate, instead attempting to make their opponent the subject of discussion. You comment on your opponent's attributes, motivations, intelligence, and other personal traits, rather than addressing the issue at hand. This obsession with your opponent distracts from the core debate, as you can't seem to refrain from commenting on the person instead of the topic."
๐
@in_my_honest_opinion
L