submitted 1 month ago by zdhzm2pgp@lemmy.ml to c/green@lemmy.ml

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Pardon my ignorance but... So what? Like, what if somecountry isn't winning the economic dick waggling competition?

[-] racoon@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Less food

[-] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 points 1 month ago

That number is not actually representative of how much food they produce, though.

[-] racoon@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I meant “food for consumption”

[-] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Still not represented by GDP

[-] racoon@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Less GDP -> more famines

[-] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 points 1 month ago

GDP doesn't directly measure food production.

A decrease in one industry doesn't mean crops stop growing.

this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2026

57 points (100.0% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

7179 readers

1 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!

RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith

Related communities:

Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS