232
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/energy@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

20% is what standard photovoltaics were doing a decade ago. I cannot wait until these are standard on all roofs in a few decades.

Edit: Yes I know the title is misleading, I'm saying these colored roof tiles are performing on par with the setup many Americans installed 10 years ago at the height if the subsidies.

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 month ago

It's 95% of regular panels, so it's 5% worse.

I would go with regular panels in that case, unless they are shaped like tiles and can provide better coverage of the roof. 5% efficiency drop but 15% coverage increase could be worth it. But I expect install costs would be quite a bit higher

[-] Hayduke@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

They still are, on average. This headline is just poorly worded or outright misleading.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 1 month ago

Imagine this + electric cars working as grid storage.

this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
232 points (100.0% liked)

Green Energy

4373 readers
436 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS