138
submitted 1 month ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/europe@feddit.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dreamless_day@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I swear people would call personal identity cards dystopian if we wanted to introduce them today.

There is nothing dystopian about applying existing laws on the internet.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago
  1. In Germany, compulsory ID cards were introduced by the nazis.

  2. The internet is a communications network, analogous to the telephone or post system. Such compulsory surveillance of private communication is not part of any existing laws.

[-] dreamless_day@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

First versions of a personal id in Germany were introduced in 1850. I doubt the nazis introduced ids in South Africa or Vietnam.

I also don’t think the internet is comparable to telephone or postal services. There is a whole information space on the internet simply not existing in the other two.

You guys need to stop treating the internet as the wild west.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Famously free countries. Let me guess, SA used ID cards for the same purpose as the nazis?

Not knowing how the internet is like a telephone network is exactly the problem. It's like making laws about breaking and entering without knowing what locks or windows are.

The internet is not lawless. It wouldn't exist without laws, chief among them constitutional guarantees for freedom of information.

[-] dreamless_day@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_national_identity_card_policies_by_country

Must be all Nazis then 🤡

Not knowing how the internet is like a telephone network is exactly the problem.

I can’t imagine AI generated porn of real women being published on telephone lines without the internet.

But yeah sure it’s just information bro nothing to worry about.

[-] HereIAm@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Because robot scam callers have never been a thing.

[-] techt@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

The issue isn't with being identifiable, it's with control over who has access to your identity. Even back when IDs were introduced, people would take issue with them being copied and sold by the bale to literally anyone who asks.

[-] dreamless_day@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So the new verification app must be pretty great as this completely removes the need to hand out your identity details

[-] techt@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's funny that you're right, but not in the way I think you intended. Now you don't have to hand it out because it's persistently available and tied to everything you do online! It's clear you're being contrarian and aren't making points in good faith, so this isn't for you, but to anyone else reading I recommend checking out EFF's post on the subject.

[-] dreamless_day@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

Zero Knowledge Proofs: The Bad News

What ZKPs don’t do is mitigate verifier abuse or limit their requests, such as over-asking for information they don’t need or limiting the number of times they request your age over time. They don’t prevent websites or applications from collecting other kinds of observable personally identifiable information like your IP address or other device information while interacting with them.

ZKPs are a great tool for sharing less data about ourselves over time or in a one time transaction. But this doesn’t do a lot about the data broker industry that already has massive, existing profiles of data on people. We understand that this was not what ZKPs for age verification were presented to solve. But it is still imperative to point out that utilizing this technology to share even more about ourselves online through mandatory age verification establishes a wider scope for sharing in an already saturated ecosystem of easily linked, existing personal information online. Going from presenting your physical ID maybe 2-3 times a week to potentially proving your age to multiple websites and apps every day online is going to render going online itself as a burden at minimum and a barrier entirely at most for those who can’t obtain an ID.

So the bad thing about this is that data sellers already have your data and zero knowledge proof doesn’t change that? Pretty weak point in my opinion.

this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
138 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

11221 readers
495 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS