155
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Deep@mander.xyz to c/science@lemmy.world

Cross-Posted, via Science Community.

Study.

The study, published in PNAS, examined Wisconsin state testing records, archival information about when Wisconsin cities began to fluoridate their water, and data from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, which has followed a random sample of 10,317 high school seniors from 1957 through 2026. Key findings include:

  • There is no evidence supporting a connection between community water fluoridation and children’s IQ.
  • There is also no evidence supporting a connection between community water fluoridation and cognitive functioning at various points later in life.
  • Findings confirm evidence published in previous research which also used a national sample, but considered school achievement test scores instead of actual IQ scores.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Two things can be true at the same time. Fluoride has provided significant benefits to dental health, while it's effects on the human body are not fully studied.

Modern medicine has numerous gaps when it comes to the chronic illness community, and medical gaslighting is the default experience when people attempt to report symptoms.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Fluoridosis occurs when fluoride is present in our bodies at a level orders of magnitude higher than what we get naturally or artificially from most water sources.

And you know what happens long before it’s at harmful levels in the body?

Your teeth start to stain from it. And any doctor or dentist who sees fluoride stains on your teeth will immediately jump into action and help you eliminate whatever source is causing the problem. It won’t be your water supply, because that’s more likely to kill you from the other additives than from the fluoride if you drink too much.

[-] Solumbran@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, but believing with an absence of evidence is utterly absurd.

I don't know what conspiracy theory dark hole you fell in, but you definitely need some scientific method and skepticism.

this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
155 points (100.0% liked)

science

26535 readers
374 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS