153
submitted 2 months ago by qaz@lemmy.world to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Yes, genetics likely plays a part. However, it would matter more about protein during early years, than average across the whole population. Once people are fully grown, it wouldn’t matter so much any more. American diets tend to be higher in fats and refined sugars, so,perhaps that makes a difference but emricans are also at the higher end of the table, despite having a more diverse population, including races that are stereotypically shorter.

I live in Australia and I know that here they have to use different graphs for different races for babies for normal height and weight. The most common European descent population is shorter and less sticky than the Pacific Islander populations and taller and more stocky than the Asian population.

[-] DrunkenPirate@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You mentioned an important thing migration and grow up. I looked at the migration rate of those countries and it turns out the the Netherlands has the lowest rate. So, as migration typically reduces the overall height - if one assumes its the protein volume in your youth - this would explain the graphs much better. It might be the protein volume not the swine hormones.

https://ourworldindata.org/migration

[-] wieson@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago
[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago

Race is a social construct, but it can be a useful differentiator when looking at populations. Race or ethnicity or country or origin etc. Whichever term you prefer.

Ignoring race is what has lead to a lot of poor outcomes for POC as most of the data was based on studies of white people.

this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2026
153 points (100.0% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

10087 readers
1 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS