78
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
78 points (100.0% liked)
Programmer Humor
41723 readers
123 users here now
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
- No NSFW content.
- Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm fairly certain that clang is non-deterministic and I strongly suspect that gcc is too.
I don't think that's true - or thst it is a bug. It would make reproducible builds impossible.
My understanding was that clang isn't deterministic by default but can be made deterministic with flags. I checked and this is still true but not for the reasons I thought. I assumed this was due to the way LLVM iterates over functions and basic blocks in a non-deterministic order (because of the way they are laid out in memory) and because some optimisations use heuristics. But it appears LLVM tries to make all optimisation passes deterministic. The remaining non-determinism comes from file paths and timestamps which can be worked around with the correct flags and some extra work to create reproducible builds.
Thank you very much for looking it up! I learned something new thanks to you.
So I guess in the end it is deterministic, because for a given set of inputs it always produces the same output, it's just that file paths and timestamps must also be considered as input.
Say what you will, Turbo C++ in 1991 was dysfunctional for anything over 5 pages of code, a lot like LLMs a year ago.