526
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I still think it's a step in the right direction. Once you make it illegal for children to use social media, you can start going after the platforms for knowingly manipulating children.

[-] evilcultist@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Or we can just go after the platforms for knowingly manipulating everyone. And for their invasive data collection. This is probably one reason why Meta spent more on lobbying (primarily for age verification) than Boeing and Lockheed Martin did on lobbying last year. Once the kids are identified, no one gives a shit about the adults so the problem (for them) just fades away.

[-] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

... people have a tendency to underestimate how prone they are to manipulation. We should amend our constitutions to include freedom of thought as a fundamental human right.

[-] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

You know what they say. Prohibition, works every time.

[-] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Prohibition is effective, it's just that it doesn't work for easy to manufacture compounds such as alcohol or marijuana. Every known human culture has independently discovered alcohol, and marijuana is a weed that is ready to smoke in its natural form.

As far as social media goes, my country has reached a point where TikTok and Facebook are preinstalled on every phone. If a parent buys their kid a phone and removes them, they will reinstall themselves after an automatic update. When you take into consideration the "streamlined" registration process, one can argue this is a means to target prepubescent children.

...I guess an 8 year old could download a VPN and steal their parents identification, but I feel like some form of prohibition would help.

[-] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

So you not only create a grey market you immediately inculcate the children into it.

Prohibition is generally ineffective in anything that doesn't involve violating someone else's rights.

If we're talking about getting rid of slopware I'm all for it. But this law. And other laws like it are an incredibly thinley veiled attempt to silence dissent by tying peoples online comments to their employment and subsequently housing and healthcare.

And I will never believe that this is done out concern for children.

[-] insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

The pre installed apps is the problem, make that illegal instead.

this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
526 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

83753 readers
2490 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS