733
submitted 1 year ago by const_void@lemmy.ml to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] grue@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Some require much more public space

Bullshit. A subcompact takes up exactly the same "one parking space" as a truck, and is therefore just as bad.

[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

A subcompact takes up exactly the same “one parking space” as a truck

Yes, short term that is absolutely correct. What the other person meant makes more sense long term.

When parking lots are built, or design specifications are layed out, the size of cars in use is taken into account. If average car size increases, average parking lot size follows. Just recently I heard that parking lot size has to increase due to the increase in car sizes, driven by SUV popularity.

There are also parking situations where there are no discrete parking spaces, but one continuous space to park, for example along a street. In these situations, bigger cars directly translate to more space being occupied.

[-] grue@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Who cares if the parking spaces are 8x18 or 10x20 or whatever? That doesn't matter. What matters is dipshits continuing to insist on building fifty of them when they ought to be building zero!

Switching fifty people from driving big trucks to driving small cars does nothing but chip around the edges of the problem because they're still fucking driving. That means, for example, you're still building suburban-style strip malls for them when you should be building walkable main streets instead.

The issue here is that we need to switch (back) to an entirely different style of urban development, and the size of cars does precisely fuck-all to help with that!

[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Switching fifty people from driving big trucks to driving small cars does nothing but chip around the edges of the problem because they’re still fucking driving. That means, for example, you’re still building suburban-style strip malls for them when you should be building walkable main streets instead.

The issue here is that we need to switch (back) to an entirely different style of urban development, and the size of cars does precisely fuck-all to help with that!

Very true, you have the correct long-term vision. If we compare the two "strategies" (smaller cars vs urban design), the latter clearly has the bigger impact, big time.

But it's also more costly to reach. It requires much more time, more political effort, infrastructure changes, ...

Opting for smaller cars has none of these strings attached. And they aren't mutually exclusive.

[-] grue@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

It requires different strategies that efforts toward smaller cars (or electric cars, or autonomous cars, for that matter) do not contribute to and could in fact distract or detract from.

After all, folks might think "why keep trying to make me change my car centric lifestyle when we've 'already solved' the pedestrian safety problem (or the environmental problem or whatever)," not realizing there are so many more interconnected problems that only a change in development patterns can address.

[-] bossito@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

"one parking space" is not a universal measurement unit, they come in many different sizes.

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
733 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9776 readers
57 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS