803
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Valnao@sh.itjust.works to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xploit@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

Mr Bob Ross would like a word...
I agree with you on inadvertently, but accident, if I'm not mistaken would generally considered something where you do not inherently attribute blame. At least thats what I recall being justification for making the change in UK in calling traffic 'incidents' incidents instead of accidents several years back. Dunno if it stuck though.

[-] Feyd@programming.dev 9 points 2 weeks ago

UK in calling traffic ‘incidents’ incidents instead of accidents several years back. Dunno if it stuck though.

Wait is that real? I thought it was just a joke when it was said in Hot Fuzz

[-] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

tbf it was played straight in Hot Fuzz, Sgt. Angel was right and there was somebody who caused it.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Although I still maintain that accident bears a negative connotation, even though blame isn't necessarily a factor. As if the outcome was a negative thing, rather than a positive, as in this case.

[-] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

incidentally feels better here than accidentally or inadvertantly

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
803 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

26176 readers
179 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS