660

The United Nations General Assembly has voted to recognise the enslavement of Africans during the transatlantic slave trade as "the gravest crime against humanity", a move advocates hope will pave the way for healing and justice.

The resolution - proposed by Ghana - called for this designation, while also urging UN member states to consider apologising for the slave trade and contributing to a reparations fund. It does not mention a specific amount of money.

The proposal was adopted with 123 votes in favour and three against - the United States, Israel and Argentina.

Countries like the UK have long rejected calls to pay reparations, saying today's institutions cannot be held responsible for past wrongs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/mar/31/epiloguetothedebateonslav

The single most important - and also, alas, the most overlooked - causative factor is the gun. Once African tribes that formerly fought with bows and arrows or spears were introduced to the devastating nature of the musket, the cannon and the Gatling, all bets were off, so to speak.

Apart from directly hiring their own mercenary armies to go into the interior of Africa to kidnap slaves and pressgang them into the purpose-built slave forts, the European slavers would go to Tribe A and say to its leaders: "Look, we only came here to buy your gold, as we've been doing for years. But Tribe B has sent emissaries to us, asking us to sell guns to it. Now, we know that you are their immediate target, having fought them in terrible wars not so long ago. Because of our friendship for you, we have told them we have no guns. For now."

[-] MasterNerd@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

The only part of your original statement that is accurate according to your article was that they were armed by the Europeans. People actually by the European-trained raiders making up a small part of the total slave exports as stated in your provided article.

Europeans slavers being manipulative doesn't excuse the actions of those who sold them slaves, all it means is that human beings are all capable of great evil. It kind if reminds me of blockbusting in the US during the 20th century. Just because the real estate agents were playing on the racist fears of the white homeowners doesn't excuse white flight.

I do kind of take issue with the original commentor trying to handwave reparations because of this fact, but we don't need to try and whitewash (yeah I know) the actions of anyone involved.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

The slavery was only possible because they were armed and agitated by the Europeans. Get out of here with your filthy victim blaming revisionism

[-] MasterNerd@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Uhhhh

I feel like I'm just constantly doing an umm actually here because nuance seems lost on you.

Slavery was only possible because of European agitators? It existed all throughout Africa for thousands if years. In all fairness, it was nowhere near as bad as chattel slavery, and you could probably make an argument that a lot of if the africans selling the slaves didn't realize what chattel slavery entailed, but it seems like the revisionism is not happening on my side. I'm not trying to excuse European atrocities here, just call out reductionist rhetoric.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

What does the article I linked say?

[-] MasterNerd@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Africa and Europe were jointly involved in the trade. Yet it is also true that Europe dominated the connection, vastly enlarged the slave trade, and continually turned it to European advantage and to African loss.

Pretty much exactly what I've been arguing?

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You read the article and then cited a racist quote it was debunking?

[-] MasterNerd@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

In case the usual suspects show up, raining charges of racism on my head, I shall leave them with two quotations, not from black writers (who may be presumed to have a "racial axe" to grind) but from a white writer (who would have nothing racial to gain by not telling the truth).

They were using those 2 quotes to further drive home their point, not debunk them. It's not my fault you have awful reading comprehension

this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
660 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55796 readers
1771 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS