660

The United Nations General Assembly has voted to recognise the enslavement of Africans during the transatlantic slave trade as "the gravest crime against humanity", a move advocates hope will pave the way for healing and justice.

The resolution - proposed by Ghana - called for this designation, while also urging UN member states to consider apologising for the slave trade and contributing to a reparations fund. It does not mention a specific amount of money.

The proposal was adopted with 123 votes in favour and three against - the United States, Israel and Argentina.

Countries like the UK have long rejected calls to pay reparations, saying today's institutions cannot be held responsible for past wrongs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Transatlantic slavery is easily traceable to the countries which committed it and which suffered from it. The time period is irrelevant. In fact Israelis are primarily the Jews which didn't suffer from the Holocaust because they went to colonize Palestine instead of staying in Germany. So your argument works against you.

[-] encelado748@feddit.org 22 points 2 months ago

Should today citizen of Portugal (under the 1976 Republic) be accountable for the legal (at the time) actions of the Portuguese Crown? Should the citizen of Benin be accountable for the atrocities committed by Dahomey to secure the slaves from nearby tribes? Are the people of Benin both beneficiary and responsible for that? How much? Should Brazil pay for the action of the Portuguese Crown? Should Italy pay because the Republic of Genoa bankers benefited from the loans and contracts with the Portuguese merchants? How much is an Italian descendent from a Venetian born in today Croatia responsible for the sins of Genoese banker that finances the Portuguese crown to pay the Imbangala people to capture slaves?

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yes they should at least pay some reparations. Now why is Germany sending money to Israel?

[-] encelado748@feddit.org 20 points 2 months ago

reply to the entire question if you can, and bring a reasonable justification about who and how much should pay to who. We have Italian descendent from Dalmatia, we have Brazilian descendent from Portugal, we have people from Angola descendent from Imbangala, Benin people descendent from Dahomey, that needs to pay how much to other people from Angola and Benin?

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Countries in Africa are still suffering from the consequences of Western slavery. The entire countries as a whole, not taking into account the people. The only reason Africa is still underdeveloped is because of Western slavery and colonialism.

(Primarily black) communities in the West could also be given restitution funds to make up their deficiency in socio-economic status caused by past discrimination

[-] encelado748@feddit.org 12 points 2 months ago

You are still not saying who should pay. The west? Is Poland, Italy, Germany, Greece, Norway, Finland, Canada, Brazil, Argentina, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, and tens more supposed to pay for the past government of Britain, France, the US, Denmark, the Netherland, Spain and Portugal? Should also Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Senegal, Gambia, Nigeria, Niger, Chad, Sudan pay for the trans-saharan slave trade?

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

You are still not saying who should pay. The west?

Yes. Primarily the countries which benefitted from slave labor in the past which is the primary responsible factor for their current socio-economic status.

The trans-saharan slave trade wasn't a top down institutionalized government instrument and not nearly as bad or prominent as the horrific and institutionalized Western mass slavery of Africans. I recommend you educate yourself a bit on slavery before throwing out random whataboutisms.

[-] encelado748@feddit.org 11 points 2 months ago

So, 10 to 13 million people is bad, but 7 to 10 million people is not as bad? Not even 70% as bad? So if we are counting the countries that benefited we should also add Turkey and Saudi Arabia (the ottoman empire) to the list. Great, now how much, and who gets the money? If I am a mixed American with ancestry from both Ireland and West africa, should I get money or should I pay money? Is Mexico paying me? Is Turkey paying me? Which percentage?

we can go on an on. This is just silly...

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Transatlantic slave trade is nothing more than a deflection argument filled with disinformation and little substance. Even the conditions of the slaves were nowhere near comparable. Slaves deported to the Americas were treated as literal cattle. https://review.gale.com/2025/04/08/african-slavery-vs-trans-atlantic-slave-trade/

[-] Lydon_Feen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

You're right. The trans-saharan slaves only had to walk from Africa to the middle east.

So much better.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Is that what the article said?

[-] encelado748@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So you are saying that the main problem finally is the way that the US treated the slaves working in the US. I can live with that. So the US needs to recognize the atrocity committed in the past and rectify currently rooted economic disparity in their society so that they can work to support those in disadvantaged condition. That is easy, solid reasoning, does not depend on tracing century old actions and works about fixing the problem. A more social democratic US would be good for sure.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

The treatment and also the scale of the slavery which drained Africa of manpower over a short periode of time and left huge critical gaps in its society which effects echo till this day.

[-] yucandu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Primarily the countries which benefitted from slave labor in the past which is the primary responsible factor for their current socio-economic status.

So, the Caribbean, North, Central and South America, and Russia? That's quite different from "the West" you said earlier.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Wait till you discover what the word colonialism means and who ran the countries you mentioned.

[-] yucandu@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Western slavery.

What exactly is "Western" slavery, and how does it differ in your view from other forms of slavery?

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Read the comments below and find out

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

Except that many of the descendents of the people who suffered most from slavery are now citizens of the countries which "committed it", if by that you mean the countries which enslaved them. So telling the US to pay reparations to Ghana would in effect make descendents of enslaved people in the US pay reparations to the descendants of the people in Ghana who weren't enslaved.

Add to that, as someone else pointed out, the people who actually captured Africans in Africa to sell to the European enslavers, were other Africans, often from rival tribes.

So not only would it mean US descendents of enslaved people would pay reparations to countries of descendants of non-enslaved people, but they'd actually be paying it to people who are in some cases the descendants of the people who captured their ancestors.

There's no way to do this with precision, and people need to stop calling it racism every time someone points that out.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

And guess what? The people living in those countries are still the most systematically disenfranchised and discriminated against of the population. Frequently getting the blame for all the problems caused by the right-wing politicians, white people keep voting in.

And the countries of their ancestors are still in shambles from the slavery and colonialism. So returning is not an attractive option.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

That doesn't change the fact that saying "the US should pay Africa reparations" misses the mark by a long shot.

And the countries in Africa are in shambles for many reasons, but the transatlantic slave trade is a relativey small part of that. Try colonialism more broadly, especially ivory trade and gemstone mining. Try the rivalries and warlords that colonial powers left in their wake when they left. Try harsher environmental conditions, harsher epidemiological condition, harsher pests and parasites.

There's lots of reasons QOL in most of Africa is among of the lowest in the world, but transatlantic slave trade mainly affected the African diaspora, who today are mostly citizens of countries that you're suggesting should pay Africa reparations. It's an overly simplistic attempt at a solution which ignores reality in favor of convenient half-truths.

Also, I never suggested returning as an option. You're just full of red herrings, aren't you?

this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
660 points (100.0% liked)

World News

56325 readers
2184 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS