127
submitted 5 months ago by KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca to c/FuckTheUSA@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

You seem to be confusing “being able to vote for Trump” with “the system being democratic.”

Well, that makes it democratic enough for them to have not voted for Trump and, like I’ve said repeatedly, that’s all that matters in this context

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That's all that matters if you're looking at culpability. It's not all that matters if you're looking at whether the system is democratic.

You literally just tried to argue that Americans wouldn't be culpable if the system isn't democratic. You keep trying to equate these two separate questions. I keep trying to tell you that the system is undemocratic and Americans are culpable.

There is such a thing as an undemocratic election. If you vote for a bad person in an undemocratic election, you are morally culpable for their actions. That fact doesn't somehow imply that the undemocratic election is somehow a democratic election.

[-] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Like Ive said numerous times before, I don’t care if the system meets your standards of purity. All I care about is if the election was democratic enough to hold the American people responsible. And that doesn’t even seem to be something you are disagreeing with at this point. You’re just getting your panties in a twist because “America” and “democracy” seems to be some sort of tankie trigger word for you

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

I guess I don't understand what you're doing in a "fuck the USA" comm if criticizing the American political system makes me a "tankie" in your eyes.

[-] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

No, I just inferred you were a tankie by your lemmy.ml account and your defense of China

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

All I did is state objective facts about China. Sorry if reality has a tankie bias.

[-] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Sure thing bud. Maybe for your next objective reality-based poll you could poll some Uyghurs

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Sure thing bud. Maybe for your next objective reality-based poll

Are you suggesting that Harvard University is involved in some secret communist plot?

[-] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Oh you’re just fucking exhausting aren’t you

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

To people who say things that are false, yeah, I am.

[-] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

What did I say was wrong? Were the Uyghurs included in this poll or not? (Note that not every sampling bias is evidence of a communist plot)

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The first thing you said that was false was that the US is democratic. Now you're trying to imply that the poll I mentioned was not objective or based on reality.

The poll does not break things down by ethnicity, as far as I'm aware. But you're once again trying to move the goalposts because I never claimed it did. Uighurs make up less than 1% of their population, so a "sampling bias" that excluded them wouldn't move the needle much, even if it existed.

[-] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

You’re so literal-minded it hurts

this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
127 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck The USA

817 readers
79 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS