49
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 4 days ago

4ish orders of magnitude’s between fly neuron counts and a human’s. Not to mention mammals tend to have more synapses per neuron than invertebrates.

So I’d say, no humans are not next.

Probably easiest to go to fish next for simplicity, but with the prevalence of mice in neural studies, maybe we’ll skip fish and move right on to mice.

Then to some primate(s), maybe working our way up through several species.

Then humans.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 3 points 4 days ago

Seth Brundle would be a good intermediate.

[-] redsand@infosec.pub 1 points 4 days ago

Say a server is an order of magnitude faster(it probably isn't you can put an i9 in a laptop). A rack is two orders, 10 racks, 100 racks for a human ballpark if this scaled and it doesn't.

this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
49 points (100.0% liked)

science

25881 readers
440 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS