271
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
271 points (100.0% liked)
No Stupid Questions
46920 readers
1323 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Assuming that someone who's been trying to lose weight for 5 years never considered eating less is laughable and condescending.
It's like telling someone with a severe substance addiction "You missed one crucial thing: Have you tried not doing drugs?"
True lol. It's just that that's usually the culprit. Eating less is really hard, and tons of people are addicted to food. I'm not trying to be the enemy here, despite what it seems. It's the fact that OP didn't say they tried eating less in their post, so that was what first came to mind.
And our bodies are just machines. We can't create fat if were using the calories we consume. I don't really get anyone who "tries" to lose weight for years. If you keep putting more food in your body than you need, your body converts it to fat. The idea of since "strange reason" that a body won't lose weight is silly. There's just no way for a body to keep weight on unless they are taking in more calories than they are using. So if OP can't bear to eat less, they need to get really active. There really isn't a mystery here. Its math. If you only add to the equation, the figure only increases. This is a willpower issue. ... Or maybe we found the one obese American whose body defies caloric mathematics.
My weight varies around 50kg and there was a stretch of a few years where I tried bulking up to put on muscle. I found it very difficult and only got up to about 65kg where I plateaued (and it was damn difficult to get to that point—required an annoying amount of calorie-counting). I think my body is just naturally averse to putting on weight. It naturally follows that there are some people with the inverse problem, where their bodies naturally want to keep fat. I have friends who say they have this problem, and I have no reason to believe they're lying; they know I wouldn't judge if they just said they like eating and don't feel like changing. There's 8 billion people on Earth and plenty of genetic diversity among us. Of all the fat people in the world, you really think every single one of them is incapable of simply eating less? Or do you think I'm too stupid to decide to eat more food? Come on.
Just because a rock falls down doesn't mean it "naturally follows" that some rocks fall upward too. There is no way to invoke a system that stores excess energy as fat if there is no excess. Could some energy that is actually needed get stored as fat? Okay, but... Not for long, as the body would need energy, since it isn't getting calories. Unless it is getting calories from food.
I went from 175lbs to 125lbs in four months during divorce proceedings. My metabolism didn't change. I wasn't on a new miracle drug. I was depressed and didn't eat, and I took up running a 3.2mi circuit around the bay where I live.
To your point, I bet OP's diet would help you bulk up, just not likely with muscle. Chow a few gallons of ice cream each week. Eat American fast food three to ten times a week. Put cheese on everything. Ignore the "added sugars" part of the nutrition label. My weekly intake fits in a single shopping bag. I doubt OP can say the same. They weigh 2.5 times my weight.
Willpower is much harder to muster for a whole year, and its exceedingly difficult to avoid bad calories in this country.
ETA: Ozempic isn't prescribed because doctors found patients whose bodies are non-conformant to the basic principles of caloric intake. It's because doctors know patients have no willpower, and its likely the only way they will accept to lose weight.
Nobody can defy the laws of thermodynamics, but some people can be genetically predisposed to being fatter, just as some people are genetically predisposed to being taller. Plenty of skinny people (myself included) can eat through loads of fatty fried foods and not put on a single kg. Meanwhile you see a fat person eating all salads and they get told maybe they should eat fewer salads.
And even if it were entirely down to what you eat, calling it an issue of willpower is just insulting. Do you think people struggling with drug addiction just have a willpower issue? If OP is in the US (which I'm assuming she is from the described healthcare system), the food there is designed to be practically addictive and unhealthy. I doubt OP has a diet of cheeseburgers and doritos—it wouldn't make sense for someone trying to lose weight to eat like that—but if she did, that's clearly a social issue of both fast food companies under capitalism, availability of healthy food, and a US food culture centred around destroying your arteries. Sure, a drug addict could simply physically not pick up the needle, but they can hardly be blamed for doing so when there is an obvious material reason for them doing so, ie a chemical addiction.