95
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Carawou@lemmy.world to c/dataisbeautiful@mander.xyz

Source: OECD

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rimu@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah the way a question is set up makes a big difference and often has unspoken assumptions. For example your preference might indicate an assumption that cars are the natural and good way to get around, that low rates of car ownership are a sign of poverty and something lacking. In this framing, more people dying in cars is just the cost of progress.

I'd be interested in "per million kilometers traveled", including cars, trains, busses and cycling. Even then I'm assuming that we should optimize for the least deaths per km when actually no one likes traveling and less travel is better. Suburban sprawl is not the only way to structure a city, after all.

this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
95 points (100.0% liked)

Data is Beautiful

3617 readers
100 users here now

Be respectful

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS