837
Instagram boss: 16 hours of daily use is not addiction
(www.bbc.com)
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Ah the projection
Bro an appeal to authority requires an authority be appealed to, you capable of acknowledging that?
I explained that. You are a dog with a bone. Just as sharp too - can’t remember the question you’ve just been asked. And been asked so many times.
So. Many. Times.
And again, no you haven’t gotten it remotely right. You’re furious and you don’t even know about what.
Beating on a straw man. Furious, he sits at the straw man: everyone agrees you’re wrong! Why won’t you see!?!
I’m sitting over here like lol this has nothing to do with me. You go be mad at yo’ little self and the straw man. Get ‘im! rofl.
O wise LLM, what authority are you accusing me of appealing to
Take a break from being a hypocrite and realize that if the truth isn't enough, I don't want it.
Broken record bro.
You can't accuse me of appealing to authority if there was no authority. You either stupidly or maliciously lied. Time to admit it, even consider apologizing and not being a hypocrite for even a moment.
Potato.
"If the truth isn’t enough, then I don’t want it."
Says the person who hasn’t answered a single question.
There was no clearer way to admit you knew you were wrong from the very beginning. Especially when I asked you to state my argument and you couldn’t do it.
Can't hear you over your false accusation of appeal to authority
Not false. If you could read. Answer the first question first.
It was the most concrete example of you being wrong I could possibly hope for, and you put it right into my lap, lol. Appeal to authority requires an authority, and you couldn't name one. Maybe you meant this, but that would make your own accusation ass-backwards according to you.
And if you can't be trusted to correct an obvious and inconsequential lie, you can't be trusted to judge anything with any more nuance... Like a court case you never attended.
Says the person who hasn’t answered a question straight yet.
Who can’t understand a simple premise.
Let me make it super simple for you: should a person be able to say someone else said something they didn’t say?