833
deadly (quokk.au)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

At first sight it seems to me that the coverage being positivelly correlated with how unusual a death is and the number of people dying in a single event, would explain that graph.

I bet if we dig into the details of the Accidents class we would see a pattern were uncommon kinds of accidents and/or those with a large number of deaths ("man killed by falling crane", "plane crash") get lots of coverage whilst common kinds of accidents with few victims per event ("a car crash involving a single car") get a lot less coverage.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 months ago

Yeah, it's not a conspiracy. They sell clicks, or "public interest" if you want to be generous. It's just that in doing so, they present a scary, distorted version of the world.

this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
833 points (100.0% liked)

Data is Beautiful

3725 readers
1 users here now

Be respectful

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS