138

In Abilene, about 200 miles west of Dallas, Natura Resources is building the nation’s first advanced liquid-fuel research reactor in nearly 40 years. The project is housed at Abilene Christian University, where a $25 million research facility was completed in September 2023.

Natura has raised $120 million in private funding and received another $120 million from the Legislature.

Natura’s technology uses molten salt as both fuel and coolant — a design last tested at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the 1960s. The company is first building a 1-megawatt research reactor in Abilene, intended to demonstrate to regulators and investors that the technology works and is safe.

...

Aalo Atomics is taking a different approach. The startup, founded by Canadian-born engineer Matt Loszak and based in Austin, is designing a sodium-cooled fast reactor, a technology that uses solid fuel, like conventional nuclear plants, built specifically for factory mass production.

Each unit would produce 10 megawatts, enough to power roughly 6,000 to 7,000 homes in Texas, and the reactors will be sized to fit on a standard truck. Aalo’s commercial model would consist of five of these units, totaling 50 megawatts.

Loszak said the company plans to activate its first 10 megawatt test reactor within about five months, after completing prototype testing at the end of December, as part of its effort to move toward commercial deployment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

That's such a small, manageable concern compared to the damage that is done by fossil fuels.

[-] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

It is, unless it's distributed in a plume because Texas environmental regulators suck.

[-] Kayday@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago
[-] HumbleExaggeration@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago

And they have enough people to maintain and inspect the hundreds of thousands of reactors that are going to be built, if those small reactors work?

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

not hundreds of thousands. they are too expensive to be that common.

[-] Kayday@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Well they don't do any maintenance. And considering the plant only gets built if the NRC says so, I think they'll manage. NRC doesn't fuck around. It's also not a good look to Trump's base to deregulate nuclear safety; they're historically the ones more worried about that.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Nonsense. We can just let the Free Market handle it

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The US has the most amount of data centers at ~5500. Not even anywhere close to hundreds of thousands.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 points 1 week ago

Haha that’s a good joke.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nuclear waste is a bigger threat to health than carbon dioxide in fact. That is truly a wrongheaded opinion, and one that you likely got from smelling the farts of the nuclear industry that has been on a decades long pr campaign to influence the weak minded.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 4 points 1 week ago

Coal power produces 100x more nuclear waste than nuclear power.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

You need to publish the methadology behind that number, as it's clearly bullshit manufactured by the nuclear industry to justify their business over fears of melt downs that would spread nuclear waste all around the world.

The nuclear influence agents are very active and aggressive, it has a strong effect on weak minds.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 1 week ago

You clearly have absolutely no clue what you're talking about.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

You are saying the statement that the nuclear industry has aggressive influence operations online, and extensive Public Relations, to sell the country on Nuclear Power is not true?

It's not a secret, and it's not in question. They are interests connected to those getting contracts to refurbish nuclear warheads in part.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 4 points 1 week ago

Sounds like someone fell for the fossil fuel industry's propaganda about nuclear power.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

That line of argument is convincing if you have shit for brains I will give you that. Go bother someone else, I'm not buying your bullshit, I know better, I don't trust you, and frankly don't even think you are arguing honestly, or necessarily on your own behalf.

Plus I asked for the methadology for your incredible claims on coal and you ignored it. If you want to keep arguing, I need that before we go any farther.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 1 week ago

I already provided you a link on another moronic comment of yours.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Not even close to true. Nuclear waste is actually very manageable.

this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
138 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

81907 readers
3157 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS