484
shotput is cheaper
(quokk.au)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
484 points (100.0% liked)
Memes of Production
1173 readers
1004 users here now
Seize the Memes of Production
An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.
Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.
Other Great Communities:
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
In Ukraine a $500 drone can destroy a million dollar tank these days.
That awkward/ironical moment when a literal flying brick of explosives can do the same damage as an advanced rocket system without costing a fortune.
Tanks have shown that they can tank hits from a drone and it usually takes between like 5 to 20 depending on where they hit. Javelins can defeat an APS and have a guaranteed kill on the first hit. If the tank is coming you benefit from taking it out before it can fire.
It heavily depends on the amount, type and shape of explosives caried by a drone and also where you hit the tank. Because of obviously 2-3 pounds of brick shaped explosives will not do much damage to even an inch thick steel wall. While a cumulative charge with the same weight can penetrate easily such target. Thus, you simply need a bigger drone to deal with a tank. Javelin wins here only because of it can automatically correct its path and doesn't need control from operator after being launched. Thus, any weapon is good if used correctly. The main difference is price here. Because of even if you need a dozen 1000$ drones to take down 1 tank this will be still cheaper than 1 Javeline round. This is why drones are preferable when you have tight budget.