Religious Objections Over Pronouns Test High Court’s New Stance (news.bloomberglaw.com)

submitted 1 year ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@kbin.social

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A revived legal dispute over a Christian music teacher’s refusal to use students’ preferred names and pronouns will offer an early test of the US Supreme Court’s new standard for religious accommodations in the workplace.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

I think I do need the transphobia argument, because transphobia is bad and it is good to argue against it. The fact "it could be fought with simple contract law if it had to be" not withstanding.

I'd amend your stance as well to "perceived sex".

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Oh for sure, and I'm not meaning to downplay the impact there. I'm speaking very strictly on the tightness of the legal argument.

"I have shown that this person is transphobic" may not necessarily convince a judge, whereas "I have shown that this person is discriminating on the basis of sex in blatant violation of Title IX" is a legal slam dunk.

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023

14 points (100.0% liked)

News

90 readers

4 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 1 year ago