538
And for anyone interested in a template:
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
538 points (100.0% liked)
Programmer Humor
29967 readers
623 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
but seriously, we need project management features that are decentralized: issue tracking, kanban, code reviews w/ comments, and ways to extend functionality without relying on a git forge.
Would be cool to see those as extensions to Git. Surely they could just be more Git objects?
I wonder how exactly Forgejo's planned federation will work...
Based in activitypub. You should be able to follow a repo with mastodon or Lemmy and then see ticket updates for example.
But it's far in the fuyure
Nice, unfortunate that it seems so distant though
You could create a git branch with an unrelated history to store this type of data; either as plaintext, md or something more sophisticated for dedicated tools. The biggest hurdle would probably be to define and agree on a standardized format
The last thing I want is merge conflicts in my issue tracker. The git data model is simply not right for conversational histories.
ActivityPub is the obvious solution to decentralize public communication. We're using it right now and AFAIK Forgejo is working to implement it for their issue tracker.
For issues tracking there's the venerable git-bug, although development has sadly slowed way down in the last years.
And I am always jealous of the way fossil repositories just have a complete front-end and wiki baked in, would love something like that for git.
Snd with relying on cloudflare
Oh god kanban