Spotify is now more expensive than Qobuz 🤯 (lemmy.ca)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by avidamoeba@lemmy.ca to c/music@lemmy.world

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

	Individual	Duo	Family
Spotify	12.69	17.89	20.99
Qobuz	10.83	14.99	17.99

I've switched to Qobuz for about a year but I had to compare their prices to Spotify for a friend. I was shocked to discover that now Spotify is more expensive than Qobuz! All the prices are in Canadian dollhairs. 🤯

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] BJ61251@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I always hear people saying this about non Spotify platforms, but I don't quite see it. I literally just dropped Deezer for Qobuz, and it migrated (via Soundiiz) my favorited tracks and artists (of which there were hundreds), and every single one of them was found on Qobuz. It certainly is possible, but I have extremely eclectic music tastes, so if my tracks existed, I'm skeptical that their library is that bad. I guess maybe if you only listen to deep cuts from a single genre it might be more noticeable. However, the best way to get them to add more music is to support them.

I still buy CDs for all my favorite artists and rip them to Plex anyways, so if something was missing from Qobuz it wouldn't be such a big deal.

[-] reev@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

The literal first two albums I looked for when I went to test the service weren't there. Their library sucks compared to Spotify, unfortunately. Might just be genre specific but that doesn't help people like me.

[-] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago

Spotify isn't immune though, they don't even have Loveless.

[-] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That is the thing, I am into what is quite a niche genre and it is very "exclusive" within the scene let alone encompassing multiple streaming platforms. Half of the stuff that gets released does so in limited runs of often 100 - 500 vinyl copies which i fucking hate personally as to me it is just the wanky scene "heads" creating a false sense of rarity to jack each other off over which tracks they own on an inferior media type in a genre that is electronic music. It is all made on computers so it isnt like digital copies dont exist.

But I digress this attitude within that scene adds another layer of a lot of the people into it being at best apathetic towards things like digital and streaming and as such everything that does get released usually does so only on Spotify. Dont get me wrong there are plenty of labels and artists that do support the digital release side of it well but even everything that is release digitally to buy won't get released on streaming platforms.

I regularly search the libraries of alternatives but so far the selection for me does not get even close to what is released on Spotify. I try my best to buy what music I can via bandcamp and that is my primary music platform (just take a look at my post history) but I dont have a lot of money so music is not a priority for where it gets spent.

I conversely see a lot of people say what you have just said and I think that is a product of having either a more mainstream taste or just being into genres that embrace streaming more than my specific tastes. I dont believe supporting the platform will help in my case because it is down to the artists to choose what platform they are on and they generally seem to be resistant to that in the first place.