130

cross-posted from: https://piefed.zip/c/privacy/p/717792/massive-leak-shows-erotic-chatbot-users-turned-womens-yearbook-pictures-into-ai-porn

Chatbot roleplay and image generator platform SecretDesires.ai left cloud storage containers of nearly two million of images and videos exposed, including photos and full names of women from social media, at their workplaces, graduating from universities, taking selfies on vacation, and more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Flickerby@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 days ago

So this is really gross obviously but the question of should it be illegal, and if so, where is the line, is going to be an interesting one moving forward. Getting an AI to draw a naked picture of someone for you is illegal? Comissioning an artist to draw a naked picture? What if it's just an original character who "happens to look like x person"? Learning to draw and making one yourself? Does it involve disseminatation vs personal use? If you make a nude picture of someone else but no one ever knows does it even matter? What if you have legal rights to their image? Would not want to be a lawyer involved in that field in the future, oof.

[-] Corridor8031@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If it is public it should be illegal,

If you do it privately, it should not be illegal.

edit: and i think any other stance on this issue would litteraly just be oppression and the actual loss of freedom

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 days ago

Realistically if its private no one will know about it anyway. IIRC the UK goes with private is also illegal and the realistic reason for that is so that if its leaked and you have it they don't need to prove that it was you who leaked it and "i was hacked though!" isn't a valid defence.

[-] survirtual@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

There are a lot of problems with that stance and I do not have the energy to point them all out, but here is the main one I see.

If you say something in private is illegal, how do you enforce it? Many harmful drugs are illegal, for example, so we justify invasions of privacy with searches of a suspect because the harm of the drugs is so great we are okay with violating people like that.

When you say digital content is illegal in private it justifies searching digital content for enforcement. But the trouble with this is it is digital content and programs can be used to search it...continuously. This sort of search needs to scan EVERYTHING of yours in private. Once you have that, they can add more search criteria and you won't even know it's happening.

You have no idea how bad this can get. I hope that you don't find out.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
130 points (100.0% liked)

privacy

7016 readers
114 users here now

Big tech and governments are monitoring and recording your eating activities. c/Privacy provides tips and tricks to protect your privacy against global surveillance.

Partners:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS