698
I voted for Trump! (discuss.online)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frazw@lemmy.world 156 points 6 months ago

Yeah the logic always stuns me.

"If I vote for a Democrat they'll probably take some of my money through taxes and I'll be poor"

Trump wins and ruins their business, they lose all of their money.

"At least I'm not poor because of evil Democrat taxes"

They have truly been brainwashed. Whatever bad shit republicans do they still believe the Democrats must be worse, because the republicans told them so. Even though the republicans have provably been lying to them for years.

[-] AniZaeger@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Many Trump supporters would like to consider themselves to be "devoutly religious" (the way the treat others says otherwise, but that's beside the point). People who are "devoutly religious" have a tendency to take things they are told as gospel (pun definitely intended), regardless of how utterly illogical and detached from reality it may be. If the "right" person comes along, 100% of what is said will be believed 100% of the time. It's something that RepubliCons have taken advantage of for years, and it's something that is second nature to con artists like Trump and that Nigerian prince that won't stop sending me gods damned emails.

[-] drhodl@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Meh. So long as they say sorry to Magical Sky Mummy every Sunday, they can do whatever they fucking want to. Don't look to the religious for examples of humanity and decency.

[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 4 points 6 months ago

...And the Left does the same thing.

Back in the day, a lot of folks couldn't bring themselves to vote for Jimmy Carter because he wouldn't take a strong stand on South African apartheid. We got ronald reagan who embraced embrace South Africa.

[-] Triumph@fedia.io 48 points 6 months ago

That's not at all how that played out.

One, John Anderson ran as an independent in 1980, after losing the Republican primary. He had been a Republican until then. Early in that primary, he was a viable candidate for the nomination. He was initially likely to take more votes from Reagan than Carter.

Anderson supported the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), as well as an extension to the time for it to be ratified. The Republican party did not. Carter refused to debate Anderson; Reagan did not. On top of all that, at the time, the conventional wisdom was that Carter was a weak president, partially because of the still-imprisoned diplomats in Tehran, and a failed attempt to extricate them - which Carter took full responsibility for. This set of later circumstances probably took more votes from Carter. All that said, Reagan swept the popular vote by almost nine points, and took the electoral college handily.

Source: I was there.

[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 3 points 6 months ago

If you're going to put words in my mouth, please order a side of chips and salsa.

Show me where I said that was the only reason Carter lost.

[-] Triumph@fedia.io 36 points 6 months ago

Show me where I said you said that.

[-] marduk@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 6 months ago
[-] Triumph@fedia.io 7 points 6 months ago

A human head weighs eight pounds.

[-] moody@lemmings.world 3 points 6 months ago
[-] Triumph@fedia.io 3 points 6 months ago

I'm not Adele. I'm also not Lionel Richie.

[-] Bo7a@piefed.ca 3 points 6 months ago

But are you an insulting dog puppet?

[-] Triumph@fedia.io 4 points 6 months ago

So here's the interesting thing: I don't know.

[-] Bo7a@piefed.ca 3 points 6 months ago

I'll be sure to keep an eye on you and let you know if I figure it out.

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
698 points (100.0% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

9892 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this. If the reason is in the source but is tedious to find (e.g. in a lengthy video), you must add an explanation for where it is.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources (for a rough idea, check out this list), and posts should retain the title (if one exists) from works like news articles, videos, etc. You may (but need not) edit your post if the source changes the title. Other types of posts should have a title which accurately, relatively neutrally describes their contents.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal. Within moderator discretion, this doesn't just include reposts of the exact same media but also includes e.g. a secondary source telling basically the exact same story as another that was already posted.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS