300
Amorous angrule
(lemmy.zip)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
300 points (100.0% liked)
196
18524 readers
469 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This is by far the worst illustrated proof of Pythagoras’ Theorem.
There’s zero intuition the squares should be the same based on the illustration.
It’s not even in my top 5 illustrated proofs of that theorem
I use a tier list instead of a "top 5 illustrated proofs" list. This is definitely C tier, which means it's as good as combining a couple proofs in the A and B tiers by taking the root of the sum of squares.
Damnit. Take my upvote, I don’t want it anyway.