72
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2025
72 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
9924 readers
416 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yes, it's "different". That is all that it has to offer: it's "different". There is no other reason why people might be interested in it.
Why is that the only reason to motivate someone to do such a thing?
Maybe we should take them that they word that they are genuinely think that coreutils would be better if it were written in Rust? Why is that such a radical possibility?
Yes, I have noticed that you are very big on saying what others' motivations are.
"Take them at their word"
Who? Has there been a survey of contributors?
"Genuinely think that coreutils would be better if it were written in Rust"
I feel like the skill-level of the contributors is high enough that they would not be so naive.
Programs in different languages can compile to the same machine code. Any advantage would be in language constructs. But if you already have an existing C implementation what advantage do you do from a Rust implementation?
I personally write in 3 languages: Rust, C++, and Fortran ( or rarely SPARK). I don't port my code across languages, because there is no advantage. If I wanted it better, I would work on my existing codebase.
Porting really only helps if the original language was hindering development, deployment or runtime. These arguments don't really hold with C, a fast, low-dependency language that is more widely used than Rust.