48
~~transpeople~~ is dehumanizing rule
(self.196)
Behavior rules:
Posting rules:
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
How about "trans people" and "cispeople"?
Honestly that just sounds confusing. It also feels akin to misgendering cis people to "teach them a lesson," which is rarely helpful and usually just gives permission to do the same back to you.
I know, I was joking. However, it would be a great way of showing people why "trans people" should be used instead. "Oh, you don't like being called cispeople? Feels demeaning? So please use trans people, thanks."
I don't mind being called a cisperson, though. It would sound a bit weird because it's not a normally used word, but if it caught on and I saw it a couple of times in practice - without a negative context! - I'd probably accept it. (Maybe I'm not relevant as ESL, perhaps.) So it's not necessarily a good argument, I think most people don't pay conscious attention to this sort of details.
This thread isn't about what cis people prefer, tho
It has partly become about that in the comment I responded to.