7
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org to c/goodoffmychest@lemmy.world

The only thing that centrists really stand for is decorum. Anything is permissible as long as it is done legally in "norm-respecting" ways within the framework of liberal democracy.

So when a centrist is rude to you, they are telegraphing the fact that they don't see you as human. Humans deserve decorum, in fact it's all they deserve in the establishment centrist view, so you can infer that a rude centrist has decided you are no longer human.

So frankly if I ever blow up at you on Lemmy, this is probably why, because I have less than zero patience for rudeness from people whose literally only virtue is decorum. If you treat me like a person, then we can get along. Posting this so I have something to link to next time if happens 😆

Edit: I tell people politely but explicitly when they're being rude and give them a chance to correct their course...but if they double down on being rude, then I gotta quintuple down on being exponentially more rude because that's the only language they'll listen to.

Furthermore, this also doesn't apply if you have literally any more principles than maintaining decorum.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think a country should be able to control its borders, thus you need a mechanism to remove people, which is deportation.

I don't. Countries literally should not exist. I oppose deportations however they are being conducted. That's kinda my point: from my perspective, you're practically with the right wingers on this issue, because some people ultimately get deported.

[-] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 1 points 2 days ago

I don’t. Countries literally should not exist. I oppose deportations however they are being conducted.

That's fine, oppose deportations etc but you're completely missing the point, which is that it's not about politeness or decorum, there is something fundamentally different about the lack of due process.

To put it very bluntly, did you fail to understand the difference between jailing rapists after due process versus jailing anyone whom any police officer thinks is a rapist? Or is one just an impolite version of the other?

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
7 points (100.0% liked)

Off My Chest

1532 readers
106 users here now

RULES:


I am looking for mods!


1. The "good" part of our community means we are pro-empathy and anti-harassment. However, we don't intend to make this a "safe space" where everyone has to be a saint. Sh*t happens, and life is messy. That's why we get things off our chests.

2. Bigotry is not allowed. That includes racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia, and religiophobia. (If you want to vent about religion, that's fine; but religion is not inherently evil.)

3. Frustrated, venting, or angry posts are still welcome.

4. Posts and comments that bait, threaten, or incite harassment are not allowed.

5. If anyone offers mental, medical, or professional advice here, please remember to take it with a grain of salt. Seek out real professionals if needed.

6. Please put NSFW behind NSFW tags.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS