396
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago

Wikipedia is like the only decent source.

[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

It's not even a source itself, like a search engine or encyclopedia it references other sources for it's content.

[-] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Or a source of sources LMAO. Still better than my Reddit comments. Which they are helpful but also stupid silly at the same time.

[-] moakley@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Depends on what it's for. If I'm asking a discrete question about a mechanic in a video game, Wikipedia won't have that.

As much as I don't like AI, it has made a lot of my Google searches better. Still not good for a lot of the things people use it for though.

[-] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Maybe you researched wrong? The way I would use Wikipedia is search for “video game”then rabbit holes (not a bad thing, more info the better)>game engine> node programming > game engine >game mechanics > gaming concepts> animation > so on (can’t think of other examples). You need to connect the dots that Wikipedia has provided in their format/layout.

[-] moakley@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, I mean for example if I want to know how the "Trusty Shield" boon works in Hades 2, I can just google it and get the answer right away.

20 years ago, I'd have gone to gamefaqs and found a text guide with the answer.

10 years ago, I'd have googled it and gotten a bunch of useless fucking videos.

5 years ago I'd have added "reddit" to my search and had to click through results to find the answer in the comments eventually.

Today I just search for it and get the answer right away.

Google's search engine has only gotten shittier every year, except in these very specific cases where AI search results actually help.

[-] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ha 20 years ago for gamefaqs, old fart but probably close to the same age lol.

Let’s work this backwards to show how we contribute to build this shitty internet… Reddit is full of bots, enough to break the system technically and mentally + the new age of Reddit (summing it all up.

Yeah google sucks, but have you recently been on different search engines? I use Ecosia now and hot damn it’s a breath of fresh air. It’s like google at its peak, just about 5% garbage and it’s easy to tell.

Lastly…… you know the saying….”if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”? Damn, gamefaqs still exists and it’s clean and seams it hasn’t lost its touch. We just kept going for the next shiny option and settled worse less and for worse. To be fair I just went on their site because I haven’t touched it off and on with 5 year gap since its peak.

That’s just my current observation at the moment high and drinking an IPA. Like myself tonight, i think we over did it…

[-] moakley@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

There are zero Hades 2 guides on gamefaqs. The site is still up, but it's empty.

I tried my query on Ecosia. It gave me the same search results as Google, but the AI result hallucinated a bunch of bullshit.

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
396 points (100.0% liked)

Cool Guides

5981 readers
492 users here now

Rules for Posting Guides on Our Community

1. Defining a Guide Guides are comprehensive reference materials, how-tos, or comparison tables. A guide must be well-organized both in content and layout. Information should be easily accessible without unnecessary navigation. Guides can include flowcharts, step-by-step instructions, or visual references that compare different elements side by side.

2. Infographic Guidelines Infographics are permitted if they are educational and informative. They should aim to convey complex information visually and clearly. However, infographics that primarily serve as visual essays without structured guidance will be subject to removal.

3. Grey Area Moderators may use discretion when deciding to remove posts. If in doubt, message us or use downvotes for content you find inappropriate.

4. Source Attribution If you know the original source of a guide, share it in the comments to credit the creators.

5. Diverse Content To keep our community engaging, avoid saturating the feed with similar topics. Excessive posts on a single topic may be moderated to maintain diversity.

6. Verify in Comments Always check the comments for additional insights or corrections. Moderators rely on community expertise for accuracy.

Community Guidelines

By following these rules, we can maintain a diverse and informative community. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to the moderators. Thank you for contributing responsibly!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS