652
submitted 4 days ago by cm0002@lemdro.id to c/funny@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

NT/2000 always gets left out of these, I ran 2000 on an old PC for years past XP and Vista even. But all it was doing was running a vinyl and laser cutter.

[-] thaklor@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

They forgot 95 and ME as well.

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

ME would just be a brick wall.

And I would happily go back to using 2000 if I could. I held out all the way up to about 2012, at which point the number of games that wouldn't run out of the box got to an untenable amount. :(

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah ME wasn’t worth looking at, we downgraded my GF’s computer after it wouldn’t run well. 95 was a big jump over 3.1, but still more like a beta for 98.

But I switched to 2000 not long after it came out. I did set up my first home built PC with 98, in 98, just got a sudden flashback to the defragging screen. Shudders.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2025
652 points (100.0% liked)

Funny

12014 readers
1582 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS