716
submitted 5 days ago by cm0002@lemmy.zip to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bear_delune@beehaw.org 8 points 4 days ago

I don’t think that’s “taking advantage of vulnerable people”

The options still exist for people to learn and theming is incredibly inconsequential.

They’re monetising to support development in a minimally impactful way, that is completely optional, and I think that’s a good thing.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

They should advertise that everything is free and can be installed after installation if you choose not say $80 gets you a Windows like desktop and software replacements that will save you thousands (Blender/Xournal++/OfficeSuite)

[-] bear_delune@beehaw.org 4 points 4 days ago

The value proposition is ease of use and integration of these theming utilities.

I honestly think this monetisation strategy of theirs is a non-issue.

People who want a streamlined experience have the option of paying for that, people who want the option of doing it all themselves have that opportunity too.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

My problem is them not communicating that.

[-] bear_delune@beehaw.org 2 points 4 days ago

Not communicating that there are alternatives to their services?

I don’t really think it’s their responsibility to spoon feed alternatives to their customers; they’re not being anticompetitive, they’re not being deceptive, they’re not blocking alternatives.

I think your requirements here are unfair and kind of irrational

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

That the stuff included is free and installable on it’s own.

[-] bear_delune@beehaw.org 2 points 4 days ago

So what’s your issue then? Zorin has a free version that people can opt for if they want

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

That they aren’t communicating it.

[-] bear_delune@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Why do you believe they need to?

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

Because I believe not doing so is exploiting people that don’t know better.

If it wasn’t then there wouldn’t be a problem with being upfront about it.

[-] bear_delune@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Okay, I guess I simply disagree that it’s their responsibility to tell other people there are alternatives to their service and I don’t think any other software vendor is beholden to such a requirement either.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
716 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

9845 readers
352 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS