581
submitted 1 week ago by who@feddit.org to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] who@feddit.org 18 points 1 week ago

Samsung phones blow e-fuses when you unlock their bootloaders, so there's no going back. I think this would prevent a proper GrapheneOS installation.

Perhaps Samsung could start shipping phones with GrapheneOS natively installed, but since the phone's owner would not have control of the OS, that would arguably not be GrapheneOS as we know it today. Or maybe Samsung could change their chain of trust implementation to be more like Google's, allowing the bootloader to be re-locked.

[-] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 10 points 1 week ago

Wow. That is some grade A bullshit!

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

that reminds me, samsung has been advertising knox on their TVs now. samsung really likes permanently self damaging electronics

[-] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Samsung would never. Their customized OS is this nested egg of vendor lock-in, with your data at the center. They would rather harvest data from 99.5% of their customer base than see the 0.5% of us that actually like their equipment buy it and do anything other than sink into their ecosystem.

this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
581 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

4076 readers
1 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS