232
Framework flame war erupts over support of politically polarizing Linux projects
(www.theregister.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
232 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
9810 readers
970 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This is the biggest issue with niche communities: purity tests. They can't unite under one goal and have productive discussions. They are more focused on being correct (their interpretation of correct) and shutting out the incorrect than getting closer to a goal. Sometimes incorrect can be as little as choosing the wrong utility and other times it can be much bigger but they all spark the same amount of ire.
Is it a purity test to not financially support trans people being harassed by Hyprland mods? To not support a figure who supports ethnic cleaning in England?
It's one thing for people to just not philosophically buy into people being trans, or even have opinions on trans sports, without mistreating other people, but active harassment shouldn't be endorsed. And I don't know how someone justifies ethnic cleansing.
Not everything is a purity test, and at this point, I feel that likening something to that just means there's a good likelihood that the person hasn't done their research or is dogwhistling. Either way, the Overton Window has now moved so far right that people don't blink an eye at calling it "purity testing" to expect an organization not to financially support openly white supremacists.
Yep, here we go. I'm a nazi now 🙄 This is exactly how you edge people out. You're just the another flavor of "everything I don't like is wOkE" but instead "everything I don't like jNaZi!".
Nobody's in the middle. There's no nuance. You're either on my side or you're an enemy. Life's just that simple.
I firmly believe there are ways of being a centrist without being a Nazi. Hell, I believe you can be a pre-Trump-era Republican without being a Nazi. But there are also fascists who self-identify in these factions, and they benefit from the smokescreen of the "Everyone I don't like is a Nazi" fallacy of argument. There is nuance. I can't help but feel that you're projecting.
Ethnic cleansing and its supporters are definitionally fascists though, and I don't believe organizations should support those people. And David Heinemeier Hansson, like the Nazis, is a fascist. And I find it suspect and disturbing that people are referring to that as purity-testing.
If your default is equating "centrist" to "nazi", then I wonder what kind of experiences you had but it's so far from mine that it's pointless to continue this.
Not my default, but okay, you're clearly bad faith. I'm done. Goodbye.