581
submitted 1 week ago by who@feddit.org to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 13 points 1 week ago

The sad part is how little things actually cost to produce.

[-] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago

Things cost a lot to produce. It’s cheapened by underpaying laborers and underestimating the cost and impact of resource extraction and power consumption, and the current path of massively scaling up factories, overproducing, and driving the repair economy out of business by making “just buy a new one!” so affordable really looks like The Big Thing That Ends The Current Epoch that people will really struggle to comprehend when they learn about it in history class

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 1 week ago
[-] BlueBaggy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

I don't know what exactly you're referring to but I assume you mean the bill of material cost that sometimes goes around in headlines like "new phone only costs $150 to produce and is sold for $500" or something like that.

That's a flawed way of looking at it because it ignores things like:

  • Shipping cost (both the final product and individual components)
  • Development cost
  • The % the retail store takes
  • ...

And of course profit which ideally is used to finance the development of the next device and ofc the greedy execs at the end who put the rest in their pockets (that's the only part which you can actually cut)

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 1 week ago

I'm not sure where you are, but I've worked in retail quite a lot of years. Where I am, now:

*R&D is paid for at some point *Shipping is probably more expensive now, but is normally not that expensive *Retail stores pay a flat rate per item, less in bulk

What is expensive:

*Venture capitalists *BoD, large share holders *Marketing (contained once brand recognition established) *C-suite *Real estate

[-] olafurp@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

R&D is a really big one though. It's a very high price for smaller volumes of phones but as soon as you get into the bigger quantities you can save on R&D (per model) and pocket the rest as profit.

To me it makes a lot of sense that privacy phones cost more, even if you could at most shave $100 off the price with selling data. It's economies of scale.

[-] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 4 points 1 week ago

If you have economies of scale, and are competing on ground other than having the highest specs on paper, yes. If you're using the latest hardware and not moving Google volumes of devices though it's not as easy to keep prices down.

this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
581 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

4076 readers
1 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS