232
Framework flame war erupts over support of politically polarizing Linux projects (www.theregister.com)
submitted 5 days ago by cm0002@lemmy.zip to c/linux@programming.dev
148 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Six days ago, upgradeable laptop maker Framework tried to convince its fractious user community to live in a "big tent" after a Debian developer objected to the company's sponsorship of Hyprland and its social media promotion of Omarchy, with both projects associated with politically polarizing viewpoints.

Antoine Beaupré, aka anarcat, demanded that Framework clarify its political position with regard to these two projects.

Hyprland, a Wayland compositor, is led by a "toxic and hateful community," Beaupré observed, and Omarchy, a Linux distribution, comes from David Heinemeier Hansson (aka DHH), a controversial figure in the Ruby and Linux communities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] khleedril@cyberplace.social 60 points 5 days ago

@Max_P @stewie410 This is just wrong. Taking a stand against things like this causes change for the better in the long run. Rails will survive without DHH, like Linux survived without Reiserfs and MySQL survived after Larry Ellison. There may be some pain involved, but we owe it to ourselves to tread the better path, and make bad people just socially unacceptable.

[-] mathemachristian 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

See also: javascript and Eich

[-] trevor 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Ah, to live in a world without JavaScript and weird, Nazi crypto dipshits 🥰

[-] stewie410@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago

As I added in another comment, I misunderstood the DHH element of the discourse as I, admittedly, don't know much of anything about him -- I've heard some references here and there, but that's about it.

Taking a stand against things like this causes change for the better in the long run.

That's also fine, and I generally agree. My concern basically boils down to killing momentum by sinking a company with (probably?) sane views on right-to-repair & libre as topics.

If the goal of a boycott is to starve the company until it goes under, because they made a move we don't like -- then that I don't really like in this context. If the goal is to force their hand towards at least transparency, or maybe force NP to step down; then I'd support that.

this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
232 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

9810 readers
693 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Ategon@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev