1496
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Crismus@lemmy.world 272 points 1 year ago

My take is that Alec Baldwin the Actor isn't to blame. Alec Baldwin the Producer caused all of the Armourer problems by running a low budget production.

As an actor he wasn't supposed to check the gun, however as a producer he failed by not hiring the correct licensed armourer due to cutting corners.

[-] Yokozuna@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

Probably the most sane take I've read so far.

[-] MixedRaceHumanAI@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago

And this is Alec Baldwin's passion project, so yeah.

[-] Mind_Ctrl@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 1 year ago

Never really thought about it that way. But yeah, whoever hired that lady should share some of the blame.

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

As a "gun guy", I think Alec Baldwin the actor is also to blame for not learning/practicing firearm safety. Always check your weapon.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Checking a revolver to confirm they type of prop ammo is very different than a regular weapon check.

Different shots require different ammo. You may have a shot where the revolver is seen from the business end, so there needs to be a bullet of some kind in the cartridge - so maybe it's a real bullet with no powder or primer. Or maybe the shot shows an open cylinder, so you need primers but no bullets. Or maybe you need to show the actor loading, so it's a plastic primer or entirely fake round. Or maybe it's being fired, so you need a blank...

The mixture of different kinds of prop ammo is how Brandon Lee was killed on set. A bullet came dislodged from a round being used for a previous scene and was still in the barrel when a blank was fired. That effectively made a live round that killed Lee.

So the barrel also needs to be checked for squibs if it's goong to be loaded with blanks.

It's not as simple as a regular press-check or opening the cylinder. I carry a gun every day and am a firm believer in gun safety at all times, but props are treated differently because they are different.

As a part of their job, actors will point guns at each other and pull the triggers. The normal firearm safety procedures just don't work with them.

[-] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 year ago

But it's not a weapon, it's a prop.

Are you saying all children should learn firearm safety to handle their water pistols?

[-] REdOG@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's both which seems unreasonable

[-] Cranakis@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Especially aiming directly at her and pulling the trigger. I don't believe it was malicious but damn; I would never consider that without triple clearing the weapon. I still would feel comfortable.

[-] uberkalden@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Can a layman even check that? The gun was supposed to be loaded. Just loaded with a blank

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Yes. Blanks don't have a bullet in the cartridge. It's just crimped on the end

[-] uberkalden@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

So he needs to take the bullet out, inspect and reload? Is there additional risk making an actor do that? Honestly asking

[-] soupspoon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not sure how there would be any additional risk as long as the actor keeps their finger off the trigger until they're ready to shoot

[-] Fawxhox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Even if he took the bullet out he would have seen it was indeed a blank. He would have had to take the bullet out and hold the barrel up to the light with the chamber open to see a previous bullet was stuck in the barrel.

[-] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

however as a producer he failed

That really depends on what kind of producer he was. Many times getting a producer credit just means you're a major stakeholder or own some rights involved in the project. A producer isn't a blame magnet, and negligence can be proven at a level lower than a producer.

[-] Ejh3k@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

As a human, if you are handed a gun, you check to see if it's loaded and what it's loader with. That is the first thing you do when handed a gun. Anything else is irresponsible.

[-] And009@reddthat.com 24 points 1 year ago

But... What if I'm an actor who's never seen a gun.. Do i quit or is it too much of an expectation for an expert to be present and why the hell would that gun be real to begin with?

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

"Wait, so what do I need to do to uncock it so that I can check it over?"
"Actually, it's weird. You need to pull the trigger halfway, and it releases. But do it carefully."
"...uh..."

"Okay, after nearly shooting my foot off, I've opened the gun, and there appear to be rounds inside!! Stop the shoot!"
"Oh. Those are blanks."
"Wait, how do I know they're blanks?"
"Same way you know how to uncock it."

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Not to mention they're literally SUPPOSED to point the gun at people, which is also a big "gun safety" no-no.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

He pulled a Boeing max basically. Where in they refused to pay for pilot training which led to many deaths until someone was convicted and they were forced to pay for pilot training. Cutting corners shouldn’t come at a cost of complete negligence for human life.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Actors go through training for learning martial art moves for a film. No reason they can do gun safety training for a film.

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
1496 points (100.0% liked)

Don’t You Know Who I Am?

3828 readers
1 users here now

Posts of people not realising the person they’re talking to, is the person they’re talking about.

Acceptable examples include:

Discussions on any topic are encouraged but arguements are not welcome in this community. Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.

The posts here are not original content, the poster is not OP and doesn’t necessarily agree with or condone the views in the post. The poster is not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

Rules:

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Censor any identifying info of private individuals in the posts. This includes surnames and social media handles.
  4. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  5. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum. If you wish to discuss how this community is run please comment on the stickied post so all meta conversations are in one place.
  6. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  7. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  8. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  9. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

PLEASE READ LEMMY.ORG’S CITIZEN CODE OF CONDUCT: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html

PLEASE READ LEMMY.WORLD’S CODE OF CONDUCT: https://lemmy.world/legal

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS