590
Note: the MacOS part is false
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
590 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
13474 readers
63 users here now
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They are removing it.
Are they also removing the Rufus method?
No idea how that works.
I guess it depends how rufus actually does it? If it's just scripting the command then it will probably be broken too.
Rufus uses the feature for unattended installations. This will never be removed, as this is very commonly used by enterprise customers.
Then it'll only be available on enterprise editions pretty soon. Home and Professional will have it removed.
Just wait till microsoft figures out a way to make it require their nifty new software for enabling unattended installations. Only $29.99 a CAL.
*removes local unattend, SCM deployment only.