97

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/6350172

cross-posted from: https://ibbit.at/post/74169

The Green Party has voted to put forward a motion entitled “Abolish Landlords” at its conference in Bournemouth. The policy moves towards ending landlordism through taking legal steps to reduce the number of private landlords and increase the amount of social housing.

The problem with state landlordism replacing private

However, it does fail to acknowledge the issue with state landlordism. Social housing is still a form of rental income and could be considered a hefty tax on housing. That’s because social rental payments do not currently contribute to home ownership for the social tenant.

‘Right to buy’ does provide discounted home ownership for social tenants. But the neoliberal context that the ruling class delivered it within meant that social housing was depleted and not replaced. In fact, the policy means that private landlords rent out 41% of former council homes sold under right to buy.

But the Green Party’s answer to abolish right to buy leaves low income people trapped renting from the state for life. State landlordism is only better in comparison to private landlordism. It’s still extracting money from low income people who already pay council tax. Remove it from the context of private landlordism, and it’s essentially a regressive policy – an additional high housing tax on low income people who can’t afford to buy their own home. Instead, monthly payments to the state should pay towards ownership of the house on a cost-price basis.

“A vehicle for wealth extraction”

The Green Party motion was otherwise cutting:

The Private Rental Sector has failed, it is a vehicle for wealth extraction, funnelling money from Renters to the Landlord Class. This motion makes it clear Green Party policy is to seek the effective abolition of Private Landlordism.

The motion hit the nail on the head when it comes to the nature of rent:

The Green Party believes that secure, affordable Housing is a Human Right, and that a core goal for a Green Government and Green MPs is to create a fairer housing market.

The Green Party believes the existence of Private Landlords adds no positive value to the economy or society, that the relationship between Landlord and Tenant is inherently and intrinsically extractive and exploitative. That the Private Rented Sector exists to transfer wealth from the working classes to Landlords.

The Green Party believes that the Private Sector has fundamentally failed, and is continuing to fail to provide secure and affordable housing fit for working people.

To move towards abolishing landlords, the Green Party would introduce rent controls. They would also put the tenant in charge of when the tenancy ends, introduce new taxes for landlords, and end buy to let mortgages. A further step that would encourage home ownership and significantly discourage private landlordism is that the Greens would enable tenants first Right to Buy from their private landlord. And all the rent they’ve already paid would be discounted from the price. One issue with this is that it still appeals to the market value of housing-as-an-asset, rather than popping the housing bubble altogether.

The Green motion also said that social housing should be built on a “massive scale”.

“Zacktivism”

Predictably, the Daily Mail sided with the leeching landlord class, lamenting “a bizarre assault on millions of Brits” (landlords), essentially reversing reality given rent is free money taken from the largely working class.

The Green Party conference is the first since Zack Polanski became its ‘eco populist’ leader. And with motions like the abolishment of landlords passing, bring it on. The overall housing policy just needs some fine tuning.

Featured image via Unsplash/Tierra Mallorca

By James Wright


From Canary via this RSS feed

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Get out of here with your naive understanding of neoliberal economics. House prices all over the developed world went up at the same time just after COVID. I'm supposed to believe that simultaneously, all over the world, demand for housing went WAY UP due to some magical need for houses? None of these countries had a massive population boom to justify this.

No the answer is much simpler. Before COVID the capitalist class obtained revenues from sale of goods and had to give most of that up in wages. During COVID the capitalist class stopped paying their labour en masse. The government stepped in and gave money to these workers who spent it on goods from the capitalist class. This meant that a massive amount of profit was extracted since there was no labour to pay during that time. This accumulation of profit was used to buy assets like housing and stocks which created the asset inflation we see now.

The supply demand problem isn't that more people needed houses all over the world at the same time for mysterious reasons and none were built for even more mysterious reasons. It's that capitalists needed to dump their COVID money into inflation resistant assets and bought up tons of houses that are mainly sitting vacant.

this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
97 points (100.0% liked)

UK leftists

781 readers
1 users here now

Description:

UK Leftist's is a community to give leftist thinker a voice to discuss UK socialism, communism, and other relevant political ideas.

please feel free to post political party media.

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS