191
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] spacelord@sh.itjust.works 158 points 1 week ago

Seems that google's announced plans to restrict sideloading on Android are now in direct conflict with the Supreme Court's order to open the Play Store to alternative app stores and reduce its control over app distribution.

How will this play out in the end... 🤔

[-] Turret3857@infosec.pub 85 points 1 week ago

with a $500m check made out directly to the commander in sleep

[-] nulluser@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

No, that's illegal. They'll make it out to the Trump Presidential Library

[-] Wooki@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Don't call it "sideloading" it's a negative term attempting to rebrand installing any app you want: taboo and illegal by effect. Call it what it is, installing apps. Thats it.

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I like this way of thinking right here.

[-] Carighan@piefed.world 21 points 1 week ago

Not at all, they can still require apps to be signed, so long as you're free to allow app installations. They'll weasel out by saying the signing is for safety/security reasons, to avoid malware and shit.

[-] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

So this means they'll take responsibility for malware and offer support, right? Right?

[-] Carighan@piefed.world 1 points 1 day ago

Of course they will! /cough

[-] witty_username@feddit.nl 14 points 1 week ago

So one dev can sign off on f-droid and then we're fine as long as we use that in stead of the play store?

[-] Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago

The OS will probably check the signature of any app you're trying to install regardless of if it's from F-Droid or the Play Store

[-] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago

No, as it stands this is the end of F-Droid. Each developer registration must include the manifest IDs of all apps they publish. No way F-droid can include all the apps they publish in their registration.

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Right and then they might well lose the next antitrust suit for weaseling around. Judges know what this kind of behavior means, though who can say how they'll react.

The timing is too perfect, the effects are too apparent.

[-] Rekhyt@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To be clear, it's not the Supreme Court's order, they only declined the appeal or to issue a stay, so technically it is a "regular" court order, which is just as binding.

[-] pory@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Google's announced plans aren't actually about restricting "sideloading" (aka installing). They're about restricting actually running the code, and developing/distributing the code.

Content distributed through these "other app stores" and elsewhere will remain installable, but your phone will refuse to run the software if that content isn't signed with the special Google's Favorite Boy token that the developer got by providing personally identifiable information to Google. Get that "certification"? Your app can be run on Android no matter how you distribute it, including "side loading" (download APK file, install app).

Don't have the ~~Official Nintendo Seal of Quality~~ Verified Developer token to sign your app with? The only way a user can run your code is by connecting to a PC and installing your app with adb (a development tool).

[-] mikedd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I was wondering if these 2 things will be somehow connected 🤔

this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
191 points (100.0% liked)

Android

32111 readers
13 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS