919
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org to c/politicalhumor@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Sure but I’d argue an example of wasted research is someone investigating the harm of mercury caused by vaccinations. Again. After it’s long been settled. Overwhelmingly

So part of the problem is it’s easy to believe some research is ridiculous, especially if you don’t understand it or don’t have context. And especially when there are politicians or lobbyists who find it profitable to mischaracterize or cast doubt. I really think the only answer is to restore respect for science, trust in whatever committee vets the research proposals. While that can be the road to wasted research, it’s much better than the current method of manipulated public opinion

[-] bss03@infosec.pub 5 points 1 week ago

"replication crisis"

I agree that the utility of revisiting an already well-researched question is low, but I don't think it's entirely wasted. Replication and in particular failure to replicate existing results is when a team can learn good things, rarely a breakthrough, often just that their procedures need refinement.

Absolutely there are much higher priority work to which public funds should go.

this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
919 points (100.0% liked)

Political Humor

1502 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS