535
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

Please name phones that are identical to this one. If just a single measurement is off, spoiler: I'm right!

[-] GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago

“Phones have been thinner than this and the tech that Apple are using now already exists in many phones”

fails to provide even a single example

[-] warm@kbin.earth 2 points 1 day ago

If you follow the phone market, then there's lots of phones that have new technologies before Apple. That's always been the case.

If you want a thin flagship example that you couldn't find yourself, then the Galaxy S25 Edge, is 5.8mm, with a smaller camera bump, better main camera, plus an ultrawide, is lighter, has more SIM support, higher resolution and brighter display, USB 3, bigger battery and faster charging.

The iPhone Air is not astonishing at all.

[-] GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

You’ll notice that 5.8 is not in fact thinner than 5.6. I rest my case

[-] warm@kbin.earth 1 points 21 hours ago

The vivo X5Max was 4.8 mm, the Moto Z was 5.19mm thick, also bonus, the S25 Edge is actually 0.7mm thinner than the iPhone Air if you measure at the camera. But why are you being dense? Nobody is arguing the thinness, but that it's not an astonishing engineering feat.

[-] GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip 1 points 21 hours ago

X5Max: 11 years old. Moto Z: 9 years old. These phones are not modern, they do not hold a candle to the processing density that apple has achieved. You are being dense for the sake of dismissing a genuinely impressive engineering feat

[-] warm@kbin.earth 1 points 21 hours ago

Ahh, so it was about the SoC and that is somehow being loosely related to the thinness of the main body of the phone?

You'd do a lot better in discussion if you made your points clear from the get go instead of being hellbent on trying to validate yourself. Good luck out there!

[-] GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip 1 points 21 hours ago

No it was about refuting all your points which I succeeded in. You cannot shift the goalposts that is a logical fallacy

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
535 points (100.0% liked)

Facepalm

3412 readers
89 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS