793
[Jenny Gorelick] Co-Stars (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Pika@rekabu.ru 49 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

She took a perfectly fine point (toys can be used in sex and enrich the play)...and then formulated in a way that would indeed be off-putting to plenty of guys.

Toys should not become LeBron James of your sex, "earning more points" and leaving partner on the sideline. They should be useful assistants at reaching the peak pleasure.

As long as the point is "my partner can drive me even hornier with this" - it is super healthy and great. But when the toy itself becomes the focus, it's not great. She could masturbate much to the same success.

Comedians often take things to the extreme for comedic effect. If that were the case, the vibrator wouldn't literally be LeBron James, but maybe Karl Mslone, who is made way better with John Stockton (the vib, if it wasn't obvious) setting him up.

Too bad there's no way to know, like a community name or the person's name in the image itself...

[-] Pika@rekabu.ru 1 points 1 day ago

Sure, but, while comedy can omit some nuance, this goes straight into the odd direction to begin with.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago

Eh, I thought it was funny. Most comedy should be assumed to be making a caricature of whatever the target is.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 23 hours ago

I respect that angle :)

[-] Soulg@ani.social 11 points 2 days ago

Even if it was the case that the vibrator did more heavy lifting in any given encounter I certainly wouldn't want to be told in this way

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
793 points (100.0% liked)

Funny

11827 readers
1144 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS