2374
Too soon? (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 351 points 10 months ago

I’m getting pretty fucking sick of seeing this ‘no one should be killed for their political beliefs’ take going around.

He wasn’t killed for his beliefs. He was killed because he dedicated his life to terrorizing everyone who isn’t a conservative white man, and was materially supporting state violence in the pursuit of white supremacy.

That is 100% something we have firmly established that people should be shot for, in multiple wars throughout the last few centuries.

[-] deaf_fish@midwest.social 63 points 10 months ago

There was a way around this that would have resulted in no deaths. Trump should been prosecuted for the January 6th insurrection. Then we should have put a bunch of fascists in jail for a long time. Then we should have de-platformed grifters.

But none of that happens so. We get what we get.

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

We’re never better off with the Dem fascists in charge either. They’re two sides of the same coin.

If we want the law to mean anything, and we want it used to hold people accountable, over 90% of sitting congresspeople and senators can now be prosecuted for aiding genocide, which they did in violation of domestic & international laws. That would certainly set a tone and precedent for the future.

[-] deaf_fish@midwest.social 9 points 10 months ago

Slight nitpick. Though I agree with the whole "we're never better off with the Dem fascists in charge either." In the long term. In the short term there are a lot of innocent people in US concentration camps and whom have been deported. Who would strongly disagree with you.

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Biden deported 250% more people than Trump’s first term, and Stephen Miller was reportedly screaming at a meeting with ICE leadership because he was pissed they were barely keeping pace with Biden’s deportation numbers.

The Democrat fascists have troves of victims, too, but the media only gives them a microphone when they’re victims of Republicans.

[-] deaf_fish@midwest.social 8 points 10 months ago

Biden deported them without going to the legal process? Like I'm pro-immigration so I get it. But there's a big difference from deporting people via the legal process. Versus picking up some guy who's a US citizen who has a tattoo of his mom on his shoulder. Calling him a gang member and then sending him to some other country to a slave prison without due process.

Neither Biden or Trump are good, but it's really hard to argue that things would be just as bad today under Biden or Harris then they are under Trump. And Trump's not even done with the first year of his second term.

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

LoL. “But he used the correct process for fascism!” You neoliberals are wild.

The Biden admin was absolutely illegally abusing immigrant detainees. You just don’t notice when it’s a Dem.

https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-calls-biden-administration-shut-down-ice-detention-Facilities

[-] deaf_fish@midwest.social 4 points 10 months ago

Ah, I see we have opted to move the goal post and add adhoms a classic strategy.

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

It’s not “moving the goal post.” We simply disagree. I oppose fascism in general. You only oppose it being extrajudicial.

[-] deaf_fish@midwest.social 3 points 10 months ago

No, I oppose it generally. You just either don't understand the arguments or are too dogmatic.

I am willing to bet that if Trump had the military kill everyone who was more dark than a specific shade of white and then nuked California. Your opinion would still be that Biden and Trump are the same.

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That you have to invent a strawman proves my point. Their actual policies are about on par with each other. One is just closer to the fascism you’re familiar with.

[-] deaf_fish@midwest.social 3 points 10 months ago

It's not a straw man. It's a hypothetical. Feel free to answer it when you want.

Also, what do you mean about policies? If Trump didn't change his policies and nuked California, would you then still say that Biden and Trump are equally as bad?

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That’s what a strawman is, dumbass.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MummysLittleBloodSlut 7 points 10 months ago

Well I think Michael Borrego Fernandez was better off before the Nazis took power

[-] Lumisal@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

We were better off with the Dems in charge. The difference is it's like having your feet on fire vs full emolation. But the point is it's easier to extinguish feet than it is the whole body, and causes less damage too.

And by this I mean peace was still a possible, if unlikely, resolution.

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I bet the people being actively killed and oppressed by the Dems would disagree. It sounds more like you personally felt less threatened under Dems, and you want to return to that place of privilege.

When the ICE raids began, Democrats published a public thank you letter to the agents. If you think this will get better with Dems in charge, you aren’t paying attention.

[-] Lumisal@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I meant past tense.

Future tense it's too late. I meant as in under Kamala instead of Trump.

Things would still be terrible, but they'd undeniably be less terrible. There still being suffering doesn't change that there would be less of it.

Not to mention it would slow down climate change a bit more compared to the current regime, which instead going full throttle on the gas pedal. And that's something that affects all humans.

PS: by "we" I meant the world. I've lived in Finland for many years now.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] bunchberry@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It comes across to me as they simply lack empathy for other "kinds" of people. If you actually felt the same pain and empathy when watching the video of Kirk get merked, you should feel that a thousand times over when seeing a thousand videos of the IOF massacring children, many sniped in the same way Kirk got merked, and then you should look upon Kirk in disgust for supporting that and dehumanizing the Palestinian people. But the fact is these people don't. They don't see other "kinds" of people different from them as in fact "people." Let's be real, they don't feel the same kind of empathy for Palestinian fathers dying as they do a white fascist dying. They constantly mock the deaths of minority groups like trans people. They suddenly have empathy and demand pacifism and valuing the sanctity of all life when a white fascist dies, but are silent in every other case.

[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 27 points 10 months ago

His family shouldn't expect empathy, and he wouldn't want his death to distract from full Epstein file disclosure.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

I expect the NRA will stage a gunshow at a nearby site someplace in the next few days, right? Its what they do for school shootings and this was at a school. So Kirk's fam can stock up on cheap ammo.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago

Charlie Kirk wouldn't have wanted you to feel any empathy for him or his family.

"I can’t stand the word empathy actually. I think empathy is a made-up, New Age term that — it does a lot of damage, but it is very effective when it comes to politics"

[-] Lumisal@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Assuming his kids are young enough, I'd feel bad for them. They probably don't understand well enough.

His wife though I don't care for at all, and will likely use his death for profit and to make her kids extremists. One can only hope they question why their father was hated enough to be killed while most people everyday aren't.

[-] BanMe@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

If you're part of a movement that's taking vaccines away from babies, well, you're evil and people are going to respond to that.

[-] halfeatenpotato@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 months ago

Well said. Claiming he simply died for his political beliefs is highly reductive and disingenuous.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

materially supporting state violence

Dingdingdingdingding.

Here's the winner, right here. Fascist fucks want to go around pretending that only billy clubs and bullets and bombs count as "violence." Inflicting mass starvation on people, withholding medical care, stealing workers' wages they depend upon to survive, and brutalizing minorities and marginalized groups (oftentimes with actual up front physical attacks) is "just doing business."

So news flash to the chucklefucks: That's not how it works. State sponsored violence is still violence, and so it follows the oppressed have a right to defend themselves. It sure sucks when the shoe is on the other foot, don't it?

But it turns out there's an easy way to defend yourself from that sort of thing. All you have to do is not be an evil and hateful fuck whose policies and actions threaten the lives of others and their right to exist.

[-] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 7 points 10 months ago

It's bad to kill for political beliefs only if a fascist dies. Otherwise nobody will even know about anything.

[-] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

See the issue with this mentality is that THIS is the mentality of authoritarians. You try to find ways to justify the murder of the people you politically disagree with while not applying the same standard to the people you politically agree with.

What you're doing is helping set a precedent that political violence is justified if you frame it in a certain way. If that's the case then other extremist whackos, including conservative ones, are going to start doing the same thing. What's there from stopping some conservative nutjob from shooting someone like Hasan Piker or AOC or Mamdani or anyone on the left really as a retaliation? After all, if what you're saying here is now passing as a valid justification, then they'll just use your very own justification to justify their own actions.

The things that authoritarians don't understand is that when principles aren't applied universally, the standard becomes subjective, and sooner or later, their abuse of power will come back to bite them in the ass by the very standard they helped establish. I am fully aware that Lemmy is usually off the deep end on politics, but this is too unhinged even for this platform.

[-] TomArrr@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

It's a conundrum. But remember, this guy said It's fine for some to die from guns. So I sure as hell ain't wasting a caring thought on him.

https://medium.com/@Setfrasers2stun/the-paradox-of-tolerance-or-how-silencing-nazis-does-not-make-you-a-nazi-53a073b33a35

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Again, he was far beyond “political disagreement.” He was promoting actual, race-targeted violence domestically and internationally. If you’re going to be a Nazi terrorizing your community, you’re going to be a target for retaliation.

[-] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Can cite specific examples of this?

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Pick any single episode he published.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Geldaran@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I agree with you in principle. It sucks a well-worded dissenting opinion is getting downvoted. I'm not an advocate for political killings. But I want to pose a counter question... When does it become acceptable to cross this line? When can an otherwise reasonable person give up on a broken system, and go from political resistance to violent resistance? Because for a lot of people, their rights, their lives, and their futures are under attack. Both politically AND with the full force of the government.

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

when they talk about removing rights from the “others” in society.

[-] Geldaran@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I don't know your backgrounds or motivations, but that simple a response feels flippant.

I too believe that you should obviously resist and try to counter someone who wants to stamp down the "other" just because they are the other. But simple talk probably shouldn't warrant execution, unless you want those same rules to apply against you as well. Fight them with words and actions, yes. Discredit the speaker and their ideas, embarrass them, ostracize them. Drive them and their bass-ackwards views out of polite society. I know this is difficult in the current environment. They appear to have no shame. But I think the bar for for violence has to be higher.

I wont shed any tears for this guy. I wont use his name. I want him to be forgotten. But I don't think his killing should be celebrated either.

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

i am saying that the time to act is now. unless you want to wait until the genocide starts. it sounded flippant because it was.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
2374 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41107 readers
3092 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS